Population bottlenecks in Polynesia revealed by minisatellites
Abstract
Tandem-repetitive highly variable loci in the human genome (minisatellites) have been used in gene mapping and as DNA "fingerprints", but they have not yet found much application in population genetics. We have investigate the capacity of six minisatellites to discriminate between four populations in Oceania. We find that in comparison to Melanesians, Polynesians have a significant loss of heterozygosity (or gene diversity), not noted using more traditional markers. We show also that the number of alleles, the allele distribution and the mutation rates at the Polynesian minisatellite loci do not deviate from those predicted by the neutral mutation/infinite allele model. The low gene diversity is therefore likely to be a result of the maintenance of small population sizes and bottleneck effects during the colonization of the Pacific.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence for the Polynesian founder effect was also reported previously based on other genetic marker systems.
“Evidence for the Polynesian founder effect was also reported previously based on other genetic marker systems (Trent, Mickleson et al. 1988;Flint et al. 1989).”
From Melanesian and Asian origins of Polynesians: MtDNA and Y chromosome gradients across the Pacific (2006) · cites this paper as Flint et al. 1989
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Melanesian and Asian origins of Polynesians: MtDNA and Y chromosome gradients across the Pacific
Kayser, M., Brauer, S., Cordaux, R., Casto, A., Lao, O., Zhivotovsky, L. A., Moyse-Faurie, C., Rutledge, R. B., Schiefenhoevel, W., Gil, D., et al. (2006) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msl093 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Peopling of the Pacific: A Holistic Anthropological Perspective
Patrick, V. K. (2010) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104936 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Whyte, A. L. H., Marshall, S. J., & Chambers, G. K. (2005) · Human Biology · doi:10.1353/hub.2005.0045 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
- Authors
- Flint, J., Boyce, A. J., Martinson, J. J., & Clegg, J. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- Human Genetics
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-263
- ISSN
- 0018-7348 (ISSN-L)
- 0340-6717
- 1432-1203
- OpenAlex
- W2050843570
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
- Keywords
- population bottleneck, Polynesians, minisatellites, loss of heterozygosity, genetic diversity, Oceania, Melanesians, mutation rate, allele distribution, population size
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, DNA, Satellite, Genetic Markers, Genetics, Population, Heterozygote, Humans, Polynesia, Genetic Variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review