The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The psychology of tokenism: An analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women
Kanter, R. M. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226425 · Cited by 3,154
Person Categorization and Stereotyping
Zarate, M. A., & Smith, E. R. (1990) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1990.8.2.161 · Cited by 344
The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology
Wilkinson, S. (1988) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/0277-5395(88)90024-6 · Cited by 322
Inclusive leadership: how leaders sustain or discourage work group inclusion
Shore, L. M., & Chung, B. G. (2022) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601121999580 · Cited by 303
An “Owning Up” of White-IST Trends in LIS to Further Real Transformations
Mehra, B., & Gray, L. (2020) · The Library Quarterly · doi:10.1086/707674 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Laws, J. L.
- Venue
- Sex Roles
- Published
- 1975-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-67
- ISSN
- 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2762
- OpenAlex
- W2061349470
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The psychology of tokenism: An analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00287213
- The paper
- Laws, J. L. (1975). The psychology of tokenism: An analysis. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00287213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
