Cited by 322Feminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesQualitative Research Methods and EthicsAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology

Wilkinson, Sue·1988·Women's Studies International Forum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0277-5395(88)90024-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilkinson, S.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Wilkinson, Sue
Venue
Women's Studies International Forum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-01
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
493-502
ISSN
0277-5395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999791475
Cited by
322
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Women s Studies International Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
reflexivity, feminist psychology, researcher identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review