The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social organization and foraging in emballonurid bats: I. Field Studies
Abstract
Summary1.Five species of emballonurid bats (Rhynchonycteris naso, Saccopteryx leptura, Balantiopteryx plicata, Saccopteryx bilineata, and Peropteryx kappleri), were studied in Costa Rica and Trinidad. Stomach contents suggest that prey size generally increases for bat body size, but within these species there is considerable overlap. R. naso, S. leptura, and P. kappleri each appear to be specialized for foraging in a particular habitat type; B. plicata and S. bilineata are more opportunistic and feed over a variety of habitats during the year. While the other species feed in the proximity of surfaces, B. plicata is further separated from the other species by wing specializations favoring high altitude flight.2.Foraging dispersion is more closely related to body size than it is to social structure at the roost: small bats group-forage while larger bats feed in solitary beats. In all of the species, food is spatially and temporally variable, and the location of foraging sites changes seasonally in accordance with these locally varying patterns of aerial insect abundance. In the case of S. bilineata, the locations of foraging sites were positively correlated with levels of phenological activity in the underlying plant communities.3.Colony sizes ranged from small groups of 2–10 bats (S. leptura, P. kappleri), to intermediate colonies of 5–50 bats (R. naso, S. bilineata), to very large colonies with hundreds of bats (B. plicata).4.R. naso, S. leptura, and S. bilineata colonies have colony-specific annual foraging ranges which are actively defended against conspecifics from other colonies. In most cases, all members of a given colony of one of these species will be found foraging in a common site at any time. In R. naso and S. bilineata, currently used foraging sites are partitioned socially. In the former species, adult breeding females occupy a central area and groupforage while younger non-breeding females and males occupy peripheral foraging areas in the colony territory. In S. bilineata, the colony foraging site is partitioned into individual harem territories defended by harem males and containing the individual beats of all current harem females. For this latter species, details of roost site subdivision are mapped directly onto foraging dispersions. In general, there is a close correlation between dayroost group membership and location of nocturnal foraging sites in all of the study species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, W. D. (1971) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5 · Cited by 3,506
On the Evolution of Mating Systems in Birds and Mammals
Orians, G. H. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282628 · Cited by 1,511
Social Organization of Hamadryas Baboons: A Field Study
Kummer, H. (1967) · Bibliotheca Primatologica · doi:10.1159/isbn.978-3-8055-0286-3 · Cited by 763
Cited by
The Ecology of Carnivore Social Behaviour
Macdonald, D. W. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/301379a0 · Cited by 1,192
Ecology and Management of Breeding Waterfowl
Ratti, J. T., Batt, B. D. J., Afton, A. D., Anderson, M. G., Ankney, C. D., Johnson, D. H., Kadlec, J. A., & Krapu, G. L. (1994) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3809573 · Cited by 938
Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals
Stephen Dobson, F. (1982) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(82)80209-1 · Cited by 855
Advances in our understanding of mammalian sex‐biased dispersal
LAWSON HANDLEY, L. J., & PERRIN, N. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03152.x · Cited by 640
Conflict and Cooperation in Wild Chimpanzees
Muller, M. N., & Mitani, J. C. (2005) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(05)35007-8 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradbury, J. W., & Vehrencamp, S. L.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
- Published
- 1976
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 337-381
- ISSN
- 0340-5443 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0762
- OpenAlex
- W2322663329
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.