The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies of female mate choice: A theoretical analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Evolution of Mating Systems in Birds and Mammals
Orians, G. H. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282628 · Cited by 1,511 · cited 3×
“Parker's (1979) analysis of the 'optimal selectivity' for males and females is very similar to this.”
Background
Cited by
The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence
BONDURIANSKY, R. (2001) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793101005693 · Cited by 1,018
No�, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1994) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00167053 · Cited by 914
Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination
Real, L. (1990) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285103 · Cited by 555
VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
JENNIONS, M. D., & PETRIE, M. (1997) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1997.tb00015.x · Cited by 459
Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains
Petrie, M., Tim, H., & Carolyn, S. (1991) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80484-1 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Janetos, A. C.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
- Published
- 1980-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-112
- ISSN
- 0340-5443 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0762
- OpenAlex
- W2052952901
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
