Cited by 82Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementVoice and Speech DisordersEsophageal and GI Pathology

Indications and techniques of endoscopy in evaluation of cervical dysphagia: Comparison with radiographic techniques

Kidder, Thomas M., Langmore, Susan E., Martin, Bonnie J. W.·1994·Dysphagia

Abstract

The technique of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing disorders (FEES), and a comparison of its utility with that of videofluoroscopic examination in patients with dysphagia, was presented in a workshop session. Viewpoints were expressed by two speech pathologists and an otolaryngologist experienced in assessment and treatment of patients with dysphagia, and representative cases, illustrated with videotaped FEES and videofluoroscopic studies, were discussed. Some of the major advantages and disadvantages of each of these modalities are discussed in the following three articles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00301919

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The degree and type of training in MBSS interpretation is highly varied and in some cases alarmingly sparse.

    “yet the degree and type of training in MBSS interpretation is highly varied and in some cases alarmingly sparse [41].”
  • Most SLPs use the MBSS as their primary examination tool for forming impressions about swallowing disorder presence and severity, diet recommendations, and treatment planning without standardized protocols and measures.

    “These data are striking in view of the fact that most SLPs are using the MBSS as the primary examination tool in formulating their impressions about the presence and severity of swallowing disorders, diet recommendations, and treatment planning in the absence of standardized protocols and measures for describing the type and severity of the swallowing impairment.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kidder, T. M., Langmore, S. E., & Martin, B. J. W.
Affiliations
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • Ann Arbor VA Medical Center (US)
  • Saint Joseph's Hospital (US)
Venue
Dysphagia
Published
1994-09
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
256-261
ISSN
  • 0179-051X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0460
OpenAlex
W2081648223
Cited by
82
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dysphagia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal and GI Pathology
Keywords
fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, videofluoroscopy, swallowing assessment, dysphagia, diagnostic method comparison
MeSH terms
Deglutition Disorders, Fluoroscopy, Humans, Otolaryngology, Speech-Language Pathology, Endoscopy, Digestive System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review