Comparative anatomy of the foramen ovale in the Suina
Abstract
The structure of the foramen ovale from six species of Suina was studied using the scanning electron microscope. In each species, the foramen ovale, when viewed from the terminal part of the caudal vena cava had the appearance of a short tunnel. In the domestic pig (Sus scrofa), the wart hog (Phacochoerus aethiopicus) and the bush pig (Potamochoerus porcus) a fold of tissue projected from the caudal edge of the foramen ovale into the lumen of the left atrium. It constituted a large proportion of the tube, and its distal end was generally straight-edged. In some domestic pig hearts small holes were found in the fold, and single threads of tissue arose from its trailing edge. These were not found in specimens from the other pigs or from the collared peccary (Tayassu tajacu), which had a thin unfenestrated tissue fold ending in a straight edge. In both species of hippopotamidae, the hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) and the pigmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) the fold of tissue was tubular, with strands of tissue extending from the atrial wall to insert on the outer surface of its proximal half. This tube was orientated at an angle of approximately 90 degrees to the caudal vena cava. Its walls were unfenestrated proximally and fenestrated distally, the latter forming a network over the end of the tube. The knotted appearance of the fold after birth suggested that the strands of the network had shortened and coalesced.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cardiovascular anatomy of C. liberiensis is not different from that of other large mammals.
“The cardiovascular anatomy of C. liberiensis is not different from that of other large mammals (Macalister 1873;Macdonald 1988).”
From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Macdonald 1988
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae)
Flacke, G. L., & Decher, J. (2019) · Mammalian Species · doi:10.1093/mspecies/sez017 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Anatomy and histology of the stomach in a newborn pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis)
Endo, H., Sasaki, M., Kogiku, H., Hayashi, Y., Komiya, T., Narushima, E., Arishima, K., & Yamamoto, M. (2001) · Mammal Study · doi:10.3106/mammalstudy.26.53 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Macdonald, A. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Macdonald, Alastair A.
- Venue
- Anatomy and Embryology
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-57
- ISSN
- 0340-2061 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0568
- OpenAlex
- W2329333654
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Anatomy and Embryology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
- Keywords
- foramen ovale, comparative anatomy, domestic pigs, bushpig, collared peccary, hippopotamus, left atrium, caudal vena cava, congenital heart disease
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Artiodactyla, Heart Septum, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Species Specificity, Swine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review