Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 149Bone health and osteoporosis researchMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsBone Metabolism and Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of menopause on longitudinal bone loss from the spine

Pouilles, J. M., Tremollieres, F., Ribot, C.·1993·Calcified Tissue International
DOI 10.1007/bf00310195
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Two hundred and thirty women aged 45-66 years were divided into three groups according to their menopausal status and were followed to assess the changes in vertebral bone mineral density (BMD). These included 71 premenopausal, 42 perimenopausal, and 117 postmenopausal women. Menopausal status was assessed through menstrual history and plasma concentrations of 17 beta estradiol and luteinizing hormone. BMD was measured by dual photon absorptiometry between 2 and 5 times over an average period of 27 months, and annual rates of changes were calculated by linear regression. BMD decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) in the three groups during the follow-up. Mean (+/- SD) annual rate of change was -0.79 +/- 1.5% for premenopausal, -2.35 +/- 1.5% for perimenopausal, and -1.24 +/- 1.5% for postmenopausal women. There was no difference in the rates of bone loss between the perimenopausal group and the postmenopausal group within 3 years after menopause (1-2 years: -2.34 +/- 2.1%; 2-3 years: -1.9 +/- 1.5%). Thereafter, rates decreased exponentially with time since menopause to fall out at the same level as the premenopausal level. These longitudinal data indicate that vertebral bone loss begins before menopause and accelerates sharply during menopause to decline exponentially with time after 3 years.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00310195

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Talmage RV, Stinett SS, Landwehr JT, Vincent LM, McCartney WH (1986) Age-related loss of bone mineral density in nonathletic women. Bone Miner 1: 115?125

Cited by

Items 101–148 of 148

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pouilles, J. M., Tremollieres, F., & Ribot, C.
Affiliations
Hôpital Purpan (FR)
Venue
Calcified Tissue International
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1993-05
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
340-343
ISSN
  • 0171-967X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0827
DOI
10.1007/bf00310195
OpenAlex
W2089599010
Cited by
149
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Calcified Tissue International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
menopause, bone loss, vertebral bone density, spine, postmenopausal women, perimenopause, premenopausal women, estradiol, luteinizing hormone, time since menopause
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Lumbar Vertebrae, Menopause, Middle Aged, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.