Relating UV-B radiation screening effectiveness of foliage to absorbing-compound concentration and anatomical characteristics in a diverse group of plants

Day, T. A.·1993·Oecologia

DOI 10.1007/bf00317439

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00317439

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Environmental Significance of Anthocyanins in Plant Stress Responses
Chalker‐Scott, L. (1999) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb01944.x · Cited by 1,624
Multiple functional roles of flavonoids in photoprotection
Agati, G., & Tattini, M. (2010) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03269.x · Cited by 803
Ultraviolet radiation screening compounds
COCKELL, C. S., & KNOWLAND, J. (1999) · Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0006323199005356 · Cited by 744
Effects of ultraviolet radiation on plant cells
Hollósy, F. (2002) · Micron · doi:10.1016/s0968-4328(01)00011-7 · Cited by 572
Tissue localization of phenolic compounds in plants by confocal laser scanning microscopy
Hutzler, P. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/49.323.953 · Cited by 396
Exploiting the potential of plants with crassulacean acid metabolism for bioenergy production on marginal lands
Borland, A. M., Griffiths, H., Hartwell, J., & Smith, J. A. C. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp118 · Cited by 371
Effects of UV-B Radiation on Terrestrial and Aquatic Primary Producers
Day, T. A., & Neale, P. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150434 · Cited by 211
Self-citation
Responses of plants in polar regions to UVB exposure: a meta‐analysis
NEWSHAM, K. K., & ROBINSON, S. A. (2009) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01944.x · Cited by 175
Stratospheric ozone, UV radiation, and climate interactions
Bernhard, G. H., Bais, A. F., Aucamp, P. J., Klekociuk, A. R., Liley, J. B., & McKenzie, R. L. (2023) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43630-023-00371-y · Cited by 138
Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation, and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, Update 2021
Barnes, P. W., Robson, T. M., Neale, P. J., Williamson, C. E., Zepp, R. G., Madronich, S., Wilson, S. R., Andrady, A. L., Heikkilä, A. M., Bernhard, G. H., et al. (2022) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43630-022-00176-5 · Cited by 121
The occurrence of UV-B absorbing mycosporine-like amino acids in freshwater and terrestrial microalgae (Chlorophyta)
Xiong, F., Kopecky, J., & Nedbal, L. (1999) · Aquatic Botany · doi:10.1016/s0304-3770(98)00106-5 · Cited by 78

Authors: Day, T. A.
Venue: Oecologia
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1993-10
Volume: 95
Issue: 4
Pages: 542-550
ISSN: 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
1432-1939
DOI: 10.1007/bf00317439
OpenAlex: W1974802538
Cited by: 234
References: 0
FWCI: 9.68
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review