Relative effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on epiphyte-macrophyte (Zostera marina L.) dynamics
Abstract
The independent and interactive effects of nutrient concentration and epiphyte grazers on epiphyte biomass and macrophyte growth and production were examined in Zostera marina L. (eelgrass) microcosms. Experiments were conducted during early summer, late summer, fall, and spring in a greenhouse on the York River estuary of Chesapeake Bay. Nutrient treatments consisted of ambient or enriched (3× ambient) concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (ammonium nitrate) and phosphate. Grazer treatments consisted of the presence or absence of field densities of isopods, amphipods, and gastropods. epiphyte biomass increased with both grazer removal and nutrient enrichment during summer and spring experiments. The effect of grazers was stronger than that of nutrients. There was little epiphyte response to treatment during the fall, a result possibly of high ambient nutrient concentrations and low grazing pressure. Under low grazer densities of early summer, macrophyte production (g m -2 d -1 ) was reduced by grazer removal and nutrient enrichment independently. Under high grazer densities of late summer, macrophyte production was reduced by enrichment only with grazers absent. During spring and fall there were no macrophyte responses to treatment. The relative influence of epiphytes on macrophyte production may have been related to seasonally changing water temperature and macrophyte requirements for light and inorganic carbon.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Tomasko, D., & Lapointe, B. (1991) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps075009 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions.
Kemp, W., Boynton, W., Adolf, J., Boesch, D., Boicourt, W., Brush, G., Cornwell, J., Fisher, T., Glibert, P., Hagy, J., et al. (2005) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps303001 · Cited by 1,468 · see citing works
Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity
Reusch, T. B. H., Ehlers, A., Hämmerli, A., & Worm, B. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0500008102 · Cited by 1,245 · see citing works
The effects of global climate change on seagrasses
Short, F. T., & Neckles, H. A. (1999) · Aquatic Botany · doi:10.1016/s0304-3770(98)00117-x · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Self-citationOcean acidification outweighs nutrient effects in structuring seagrass epiphyte communities
Campbell, J. E., & Fourqurean, J. W. (2014) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12233 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Zimmerman, R. C., Hill, V. J., & Gallegos, C. L. (2015) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.1002/lno.10139 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
- Authors
- Neckles, H. A., Wetzel, R. L., & Orth, R. J.
- Affiliations
- William & Mary (US)
- Venue
- Oecologia
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 285-295
- ISSN
- 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1939
- OpenAlex
- W1979220548
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Oecologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
- Keywords
- Zostera marina, epiphytes, macrophyte growth, nutrient enrichment, grazing, inorganic nitrogen, phosphate, Isopoda, Amphipoda, Gastropoda, seasonal variation, York River estuary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review