The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic significance and surgical management of locoregional lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid cancer
Abstract
We studied the records of 342 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma out of a total of 728 thyroid cancer patients treated at the Medical School of Hannover (MHH) from 1972 through 1992. The comprehensive data‐abstracting forms were designed, and the acquired information was coded, stored, maintained, and evaluated by the Clinical Cancer Registry of the MHH. A total of 160 patients (46.8%) initially had lymph node metastases (N1 status). The N status significantly influenced recurrence (p<0.00001) and survival (p<0.00001). Excluding other risk factors developed by univariate and multivariate analysis, such as high age (age >45 years, p<0.001), tumor invasion (T4 tumor, p<0.005), and distant metastases (M1, p<0.001), lymph node metastases remained an independent, highly significant prognostic marker for more aggressive papillary thyroid cancer. N1 status did not influence survival of patients with T4 tumor but did influence those with T1–T3 status (p<0.001). The influence of N1 status remained significant in patients older (p<0.001) and younger (p<0.05) than 45 years of age. Systematic compartmentoriented dissection of lymph node metastases improved survival (p<0.005, T1–T3) and recurrence (p<0.00001, T1–T3) especially in patients with T1–T3 tumors. In conclusion, lymph node metastases with a significant incidence at a young age and male sex had a substantial effect on survival and recurrence especially in those with tumor status T1–T3. Systematic compartment‐oriented dissection of the lymph node metastases results in better survival and a lower recurrence rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Cooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Haugen, B. R., Kloos, R. T., Lee, S. L., Mandel, S. J., Mazzaferri, E. L., McIver, B., Pacini, F., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2009) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110 · Cited by 6,707
Ringel, M. D., Sosa, J. A., Baloch, Z., Bischoff, L., Bloom, G., Brent, G. A., Brock, P. L., Chou, R., Flavell, R. R., Goldner, W., et al. (2025) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1177/10507256251363120 · Cited by 710
Pattern of Nodal Metastasis for Primary and Reoperative Thyroid Cancer
Machens, A., Hinze, R., Thomusch, O., & Dralle, H. (2002) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-001-0176-3 · Cited by 508
Self-citationTsang, R. W., Brierley, J. D., Simpson, W. J., Panzarella, T., Gospodarowicz, M. K., & Sutcliffe, S. B. (1998) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980115)82:2<389::aid-cncr19>3.0.co;2-v · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Scheumann, G. F. W., Gimm, O., Wegener, G., Hundeshagen, H., & Dralle, H.
- Venue
- World Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 559-567
- ISSN
- 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2323
- OpenAlex
- W2016336194
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic significance and surgical management of locoregional lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00353765
- The paper
- Scheumann, G. F. W., Gimm, O., Wegener, G., Hundeshagen, H., & Dralle, H. (1994). Prognostic significance and surgical management of locoregional lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid cancer. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00353765
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.