The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies suggest that a genuine commitment to sustainability can inversely impact firm performance.
“Some studies suggest that a genuine commitment to sustainability can inversely impact firm performance (Pava & Krausz, 1996) while others show that both variables (sometimes through a mediator) are mutually compatible and have a positive sum (Ren, Fan, & Tang, 2022;Ren, Jiang, & Tang, 2022;Úbeda-García et al., 2021).”
From Advancing the sustainability agenda through strategic human resource management: Insights and suggestions for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Pava & Krausz, 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard—Linking sustainability management to business strategy
Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.339 · Cited by 1,245 · see citing works
Ren, S., Cooke, F. L., Stahl, G. K., Fan, D., & Timming, A. R. (2023) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22169 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Constructing a Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation Using Corporate Image Advertising
Pomering, A., & Johnson, L. W. (2009) · Australasian Marketing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.05.006 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J.
- Affiliations
- Yeshiva University (US)
- ORCID
- Pava, Moses L.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 321-357
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W1973295309
- Cited by
- 883
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 17.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Keywords
- corporate social responsibility, financial performance, socially responsible investment, social screening, investor preferences, institutional investors, portfolio diversification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
