The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Business ethics: A literature review with a focus on marketing ethics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward A Unified Conception Of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9410210749 · Cited by 4,004
Social contracts and marketing ethics
Dunfee, T. W., Smith, N. C., & Ross, W. T. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299906300302 · Cited by 370
Social movements for global capitalism: the transnational capitalist class in action
Sklair, L. (1997) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/096922997347733 · Cited by 224
Purchase decision‐making in fair trade and the ethical purchase ‘gap’: ‘is there a fair trade twix?’
Nicholls, A., & Lee, N. (2006) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/09652540600956384 · Cited by 199
The Impact of Political Skill on Employees’ Perceptions of Ethical Leadership
Harvey, P., Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., Buckless, A., & Pescosolido, A. T. (2014) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051813483834 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsalikis, J., & Fritzsche, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 695-743
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W2020461989
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.