Cited by 101Heavy Metals in PlantsHeavy metals in environmentPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects

A nickel-accumulating plant from Western Australia

Severne, B. C., Brooks, R. R.·1972·Planta

Abstract

A small shrub Hybanthus floribundus (Lindl.) F. Muell. Violaceae growing in Western Australia accumulates nickel and cobalt to a very high degree. Values of up to 23% nickel in leaf ash may represent the highest relative accumulation of a metal on record. The high accumulation of nickel poses interesting problems in plant physiology and plant biochemistry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00394610

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Severne, B. C., & Brooks, R. R.
Affiliations
Massey University (NZ)
Venue
Planta
Published
1972
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
91-94
ISSN
  • 0032-0935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2048
OpenAlex
W2006551193
Cited by
101
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Planta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Keywords
nickel accumulation, cobalt accumulation, Violaceae, metal hyperaccumulation, leaf ash, plant physiology, plant biochemistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review