The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relevant logic and the theory of information
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Beyond that, however, the usual structural rules of classical inference turn out to fail 50 , and thus, there is a strong connection between substructural logics and what might be called abstract information theory (Mares 1996, Restall 2000, Mares 2003).”
From THE STORIES OF LOGIC AND INFORMATION (2008) · cites this paper as Mares 1996
Citations
Cites
Knowledge and the Flow of Information.
Alston, W. P., & DRETSKE, F. I. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184492 · Cited by 3,283
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. R. (1981) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2026578 · Cited by 2,361
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. R. (2004) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195136975.003.0015 · Cited by 673
Devlin, K. (1991) · Cited by 583
Routley, R., & Meyer, R. (1973) · Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics · doi:10.1016/s0049-237x(08)71541-6 · Cited by 376
Barwise, J. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 369
The semantics of entailment?II
Routley, R., & Meyer, R. K. (1972) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/bf00649991 · Cited by 219
Cowart, W. (1993) · Language · doi:10.2307/416566 · Cited by 147
The semantics of entailment ? III
Routley, R., & Meyer, R. K. (1972) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/bf00650498 · Cited by 145
Israel, D. J., & Perry, J. R. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203055045-48 · Cited by 131
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Anderson, A. R. and N. D. Belnap Jr.: 1975, Entailment: Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- Anderson, A. R., N. D. Belnap, Jr., and J. M. Dunn: 1992, Entailment: Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. 2, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- Barwise, J.: 1989a, ?On the Model Theory of Common Knowledge?, in Barwise 1989, pp. 203?220.
- Barwise, J., J. M. Gawron, G. Plotkin, and S. Tutiya: 1981, Situation Theory and its Applications, Vol. 2, Stanford.
- Cooper, R.: 1991, ?Persistence and Structural Determination?, in Barwise et al. 1991, pp. 295?309.
- Cooper, R. and J. Kamp: 1991, ?Negation in Situation Semantics and Discourse Representation Theory?, in Barwise et al. 1991, pp. 311?33.
- Israel, D. and J. Perry: 1991, ?Information and Architecture?, in Barwise et al. 1991, pp. 147?59.
- Routley, F. R. and R. K. Meyer: 1976, ?Every Sentential Logc Has a Two-Valued Semantics?, Logique et analyse n.s. 19, 345?65.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction
van Benthem, J. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511974533 · Cited by 512
Priest, G. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199263280.001.0001 · Cited by 376
Dunn, J. M., & Restall, G. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0460-1_1 · Cited by 292
On the Ternary Relation and Conditionality
Beall, J., Brady, R. T., Dunn, J. M., Hazen, A., MARES, E. D., Meyer, R. K., Priest, G., Restall, G., Ripley, D., Slaney, J., et al. (2011) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/s10992-011-9191-5 · Cited by 123
Self-citationTHE STORIES OF LOGIC AND INFORMATION
van Benthem, J., & Martinez, M. (2008) · Philosophy of Information · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51726-5.50012-1 · Cited by 80
HYPE: A System of Hyperintensional Logic (with an Application to Semantic Paradoxes)
Leitgeb, H. (2018) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/s10992-018-9467-0 · Cited by 79
Relevant and substructural logics
Restall, G. (2006) · Handbook of the history of logic · doi:10.1016/s1874-5857(06)80030-0 · Cited by 43
Truthmaker Semantics for Relevant Logic
Jago, M. T. (2020) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/s10992-019-09533-9 · Cited by 32
Priest, G. (2019) · Outstanding contributions to logic · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25365-3_27 · Cited by 29
The frame problem, the relevance problem, and a package solution to both
Xu, Y., & Wang, P. (2012) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0117-8 · Cited by 22
Brady, R. T., & Mortensen, C. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6958-8_18 · Cited by 21
LOGICAL PLURALISM AND SEMANTIC INFORMATION
Allo, P. (2007) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/s10992-007-9054-2 · Cited by 21
The Philosophy of Alternative Logics
Aberdein, A., & Read, S. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195137316.003.0041 · Cited by 21
The Relevance of Relevance to Relevance Logic
Dunn, J. M. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45824-2_2 · Cited by 17
Informational Semantics as a Third Alternative?
Allo, P., & MARES, E. D. (2011) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9356-1 · Cited by 14
Self-citationEpistemic extensions of modal distributive substructural logics
Sedlár, I. (2014) · Journal of Logic and Computation · doi:10.1093/logcom/exu034 · Cited by 14
Actual Issues for Relevant Logics
Standefer, S. (2020) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0007.008 · Cited by 12
Dynamic Epistemic Logic as a Substructural Logic
Aucher, G. (2014) · Outstanding contributions to logic · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06025-5_33 · Cited by 12
Understanding Negation Implicationally in the Relevant Logic R
Onishi, T. (2016) · Studia Logica · doi:10.1007/s11225-016-9676-x · Cited by 12
Dynamic epistemic logic in update logic
Aucher, G. (2016) · Journal of Logic and Computation · doi:10.1093/logcom/exw002 · Cited by 10
Information Flow in Logics in the Vicinity of BB
Tedder, A. (2021) · The Australasian Journal of Logic · doi:10.26686/ajl.v18i1.6288 · Cited by 10
Epistemic Logics for Relevant Reasoners
Sedlár, I., & Vigiani, P. (2024) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/s10992-024-09770-7 · Cited by 9
Relevant propositional dynamic logic
Tedder, A., & Bílková, M. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03732-9 · Cited by 8
Aucher, G. (2016) · Journal of Logic and Computation · doi:10.1093/logcom/exw001 · Cited by 6
Is Dialetheism an Idealism? The Russellian Fallacy and the Dialetheist's Dilemma
Berto, F. (2007) · dialectica · doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2007.01101.x · Cited by 5
MARES, E. D. (2006) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470996751.ch39 · Cited by 5
Self-citationA reason maintenance perspective on relevant Ramsey conditionals
Ismail, H. O. (2009) · Logic Journal of IGPL · doi:10.1093/jigpal/jzp036 · Cited by 5
Epistemic Relevance and Epistemic Actions
Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2016) · Outstanding contributions to logic · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29300-4_8 · Cited by 4
MARES, E. D., & Meyer, R. K. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781405164801.ch13 · Cited by 4
Self-citationA Substructural Approach to Explicit Modal Logic
Standefer, S. (2022) · Journal of Logic Language and Information · doi:10.1007/s10849-022-09380-z · Cited by 4
Relevant Reasoning and Implicit Beliefs
Sedlár, I., & Vigiani, P. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39784-4_21 · Cited by 4
Conjunctive and Disjunctive Parts
Jago, M. T. (2023) · Outstanding contributions to logic · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29415-0_9 · Cited by 4
THE RELEVANT FRAGMENT OF FIRST ORDER LOGIC
Badía, G. (2015) · The Review of Symbolic Logic · doi:10.1017/s1755020315000313 · Cited by 4
A positive information logic for inferential information
Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2008) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9406-7 · Cited by 3
Information, Negation, and Paraconsistency
MARES, E. D. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4438-7_4 · Cited by 3
Self-citationPriest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0013 · Cited by 3
The nature of entailment: an informational approach
Shramko, Y., & Wansing, H. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02474-5 · Cited by 2
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0005 · Cited by 2
Øgaard, T. F. (2024) · Trends in logic · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69940-5_4 · Cited by 2
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0011 · Cited by 2
Information and Logical Discrimination
Allo, P. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30870-3_3 · Cited by 2
Noisy vs. Merely Equivocal Logics
Allo, P. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4438-7_5 · Cited by 1
Aristotle on the Law of Non-Contradiction
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0002 · Cited by 1
Information and Pluralism. Consequences for Scientific Representation and Methods
Camardi, G. (2020) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52500-2_6 · Cited by 1
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0001 · Cited by 1
The languages of relevant logic: a model-theoretic perspective
Badía, G. (2017) · Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago) · Cited by 1
On When a Disjunction Is Informative
Allo, P. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1923-1_1
Computer Assistance for, or Insights into, Organisational Aspects
Nissan, E. (2011) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8990-8_4
Logisch Pluralisme en InformatiePreprint
Allo, P. (2005) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam)
An Explanation for the Ternary Relation R in the Relational Semantics of Relevance Logic
Zhou, B., & Jia, Q. (2015) · Logic in Asia: Studia logica library · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47197-5_10
A Characterization of Displayable Logics Extending Update LogicPreprint
Aucher, G. (2016)
A Lindström-style theorem for finitary propositional weak entailment languages with absurdity
Badía, G. (2016) · Logic Journal of IGPL · doi:10.1093/jigpal/jzv054
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0007
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0003
Decidable temporal and sequential relevant logics*
Kamide, N. (2017) · Journal of Logic and Computation · doi:10.1093/logcom/exx041
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0004
Yllescas, J. C. T. (2022) · Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación · doi:10.5209/clac.76640
Consistency and the Empirical Sciences
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0010
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0012
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0009
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0006
Priest, G. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.003.0008
(2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.002.0001
(2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.001.0001.002.004
(2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199263280.001.0001.002.003
Classical reasoning in the justification paradigm
Peluce, V. A. (2022) · Journal of Logic and Computation · doi:10.1093/logcom/exac076
Fuzzy Truth, Fuzzy Support and Fuzzy Information States for Inquisitive Semantics
Punčochář, V. (2023) · Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning · doi:10.24963/kr.2023/56
The Mereological Basis of Truthmaker Semantics
Porello, D., & Gonella, G. (2024) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-024-10084-1
К вопросу о «релевантном» принципе дедукции
Moiseeva, A. Y. (2024) · Логико-философские штудии · doi:10.52119/lphs.2024.87.29.004
Contextual Entailment and Containment: A Ternary Approach to Information and Topic Inclusion
Vigiani, P., & Ferguson, T. M. (2025) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-025-00978-w
Impossible Worlds Are Here to Stay
Berto, F. (2026) · Crítica (México D F En línea) · doi:10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2026.1744
Metadata
- Authors
- Mares, E. D.
- Affiliations
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Mares, Edwin D.
- ORCID
- Mares, Edwin D.
- Venue
- Synthese
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-360
- ISSN
- 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0964
- OpenAlex
- W1989699667
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Synthese (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- relevant logic, Routley-Meyer semantics, information-theoretic interpretation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
