Cited by 10Psychometric Methodologies and TestingSurvey Methodology and NonresponseBehavioral Health and Interventions

The impact of response format on relations among intentions, attitudes and social norms

Ellen, Pam Scholder, Madden, Thomas J.·1990·Marketing Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00435299

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study on prediction of intentions in the context of the theory of reasoned action, prediction of intentions from attitudes and subjective norms was better under conditions that required careful responding (random order of items, computer-administered) than in comparison conditions.

    “The prediction of intentions from attitudes and subjective norms was better under conditions that required careful responding (random order of items, computer-administered) than in the comparison conditions.”

    From The theory of planned behavior (1991) · cites this paper as Ellen & Madden, 1990

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Ajzen, Icek, and MartinFishbein. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  2. Bagozzi, Richard P. (1982). ?A Field Investigation of Causal Relations Among Cognitions, Affect, Intentions, and Behavior,? Journal of Marketing Research 19 (November), 562?584. · DOI
  3. Beckwith, Neil E., and U. VictorKubilius. (1978). ?Empirical Evidence of Halo Effects in Store Image Research by Estimating True Locations,? Advances in Consumer Research 5, 485?493.
  4. Beckwith, Neil E., and Donald R.Lehmann. (1975). ?The Importance of Halo Effects in Multi-Attribute Attitude Models,? Journal of Marketing Research 12 (August), 265?275. · DOI
  5. Beckwith, Neil E., Harold H.Kassarjian, and Donald R.Lehmann. (1978). ?Halo Effects in Marketing Research: Review and Prognosis,? Advances in Consumer Research 5, 465?467.
  6. Chan, Florentius, JosephKarbowski, Richard A.Monty, and Lawrence C.Perlmuter. (1986). ?Performance as a Source of Perceived Control,? Motivation and Emotion 10 (1), 59?70. · DOI
  7. Cooper, William H. (1981). ?Ubiquitous Halo,? Psychological Bulletin 90 (2), 218?244. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Fazio, R. H., T. M.Lenn, and E. A.Effrein. (1984). ?Spontaneous Attitude Formation,? Social Cognition 2, 217?234. · DOI
  9. Feldman, Jack M., and John G.LynchJr. (1988). ?Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior,? Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (3), 421?435. · DOI
  10. Laroche, Michel. (1978). ?Four Methodological Problems in Multi-Attribute Attitude Models,? Advances in Consumer Research 5, 175?179.
  11. Liefeld, John P. (1988). ?Response Effects in Computer Administered Questioning,? Journal of Marketing Research 25 (November), 405?409. · DOI
  12. O'Brien, Terry, and ValerieDugdale. (1978). ?Questionnaire Administration by Computer,? Journal of the Market Research Society 20(4), 228?237.
  13. Sheppard, Blair H., JonHartwick, and Paul R.Warshaw. (1988). ?The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research,? Journal of Consumer Research 15 (December), 325?343. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Tesser, Abraham. (1978). ?Self-Generated Attitude Change.? In L.Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press. 289?338.
  15. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). ?A Constant Error in Psychological Ratings,? Journal of Applied Psychology 4, 25?29. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Tourangeau, Roger, and Kenneth A.Rasinski. (1988). ?Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement,? Psychological Bulletin 103(3), 299?314. · DOI
  17. Wilkie, William L., John M.McCann, and David J.Reibstein. (1973). ?Halo Effects in Brand Belief Measurement: Implications for Attitude Model Development,? Advances in Consumer Research 1, 280?290.
  18. Wilson, Timothy D., Dana S.Dunn, DoloresKraft, and Douglas J.Lisle. (1989). ?Introspection, Attitude Change, and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Disruptive Effects of Explaining Why We Feel the Way We Do.? In L.Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 287?343.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellen, P. S., & Madden, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Marketing Letters
Published
1990-06
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
161-170
ISSN
  • 0923-0645 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-059X
OpenAlex
W2081478514
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Marketing Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
theory of reasoned action, social norms, response format, item order effects, questionnaire administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review