The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Forelimb regeneration from different levels of amputation in the newt,Notophthalmus viridescens: Length, rate, and stages
Open accessAbstract
Summary1.Some aspects of the influence of position on regeneration have been examined by comparing regeneration from two different levels along the newt forelimb.2.We have defined a series of stages of forelimb regeneration in the newt,Notophthalmus viridescens, in order to facilitate this study.3.Limbs amputated at either a proximal level (through the humerus) or a distal level (through the radius and ulna) pass through the same stages at the same times after amputation.4.The histological sequence of events of digit regeneration was compared with that of limb regeneration from a proximal level of amputation and was found to be the same.5.In limbs amputated at either proximal or distal levels, the rate of elongation of regenerates is the same during the phases of dedifferentiation, blastema accumulation, and blastema growth.6.During the phase of differentiation and morphogenesis, the rate of elongation of regenerates from the proximal level is significantly greater than that of regenerates from the distal level.7.The total length of regenerates from proximal and distal levels along the limb is significantly different.8.The results indicate that positional information does not influence the developmental sequence of events of limb regeneration, but that it does influence the rate of growth of the regenerate and the specification of the structures to be replaced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diesendruck, C. E., Sottos, N. R., Moore, J. S., & White, S. R. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201500484 · Cited by 455
Recurrent turnover of senescent cells during regeneration of a complex structure
Yun, M. H., Davaapil, H., & Brockes, J. P. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.05505 · Cited by 385
Sandoval-Guzmán, T., Wang, H., Khattak, S., Schuez, M., Roensch, K., Nacu, E., Tazaki, A., Joven, A., Tanaka, E. M., & Simon, A. (2014) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.007 · Cited by 326
Sequencing and chromosome-scale assembly of the giant Pleurodeles waltl genome
Brown, T., Elewa, A., Iarovenko, S., Subramanian, E., Araus, A. J., Petzold, A., Suzuki, M., Suzuki, K.-I. T., Hayashi, T., Toyoda, A., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.10.19.512763 · Cited by 37
Toward whole tissue imaging of axolotl regeneration
Masselink, W., & Tanaka, E. M. (2021) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.282 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Iten, L. E., & Bryant, S. V.
- Venue
- Wilhelm Roux' Archiv f�r Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen
- Published
- 1973
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 263-282
- ISSN
- 0043-5546 (ISSN-L)
- 0949-944X
- 1432-041X
- OpenAlex
- W1981691440
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Forelimb regeneration from different levels of amputation in the newt,Notophthalmus viridescens: Length, rate, and stages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00575834
- The paper
- Iten, L. E., & Bryant, S. V. (1973). Forelimb regeneration from different levels of amputation in the newt,Notophthalmus viridescens: Length, rate, and stages. Wilhelm Roux' Archiv f�r Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00575834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.