Liposomal tretinoin for uncomplicated acne vulgaris
Abstract
Frequently occurring skin irritancy and flare-up reactions impede the use of topical tretinoin for acne vulgaris due to poor patient compliance. Liposome encapsulation improves penetration into the skin and local tolerability in animals. We investigated efficacy and local tolerability of liposomal tretinoin in man. In a double-blind study 20 patients with uncomplicated acne vulgaris received liposomal tretinoin (0.01%) on one side of the body and a commercial gel preparation with either 0.025% or 0.05% on the other once daily for 10 weeks. Comedones and papules/pustules were counted every 2 (-4) weeks. Then also redness, scaling, and burning were rated according to a four-point scale. Moreover, the patients noted skin irritancy in a diary on a daily base. With conventional tretinoin the gels were equally efficacious and equally well tolerated. Liposomal tretinoin also appeared equipotent to the reference gels. There may even have been a slightly more rapid clearing of comedones following the liposome preparation. With respect to skin irritancy, however, liposomal tretinoin was superior. As rated by the patients, liposome encapsulated tretinoin induced less burning (mean cumulative score 2.7 +/- 1.2) than the 0.025% gel (16.1 +/- 7.1) and the 0.05% gel (9.7 +/- 4.1) gel and less erythema (1.8 +/- 0.7) than the 0.025% gel (11.4 +/- 3.8; (P < 0.05). Liposomal tretinoin was also better tolerated according to the rating by the investigator. Liposomal encapsulation of tretinoin all…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A review of the literature suggests that there is no conclusive evidence showing compromised skin always leads to greater penetration.
“However, to date, a review of the literature suggests that there is no conclusive evidence showing compromised skin always lead to greater penetration (66).”
From Photoprotection: a Review of the Current and Future Technologies (2010) · cites this paper as [66]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photoprotection: a Review of the Current and Future Technologies
Wang, S. Q., Balagula, Y., & Osterwalder, U. (2010) · Dermatologic Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2009.01289.x · Cited by 294 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sch�fer-Korting, M., Korting, H. C., & Ponce-P�schl, E.
- Affiliations
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Venue
- The Clinical Investigator
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1086-1091
- ISSN
- 0946-2716 (ISSN-L)
- 0941-0198
- 1432-1440
- OpenAlex
- W2135431635
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Keywords
- acne, topical tretinoin, liposome encapsulation, skin irritation, local tolerance, comedones, erythema, medication adherence, topical gel formulation
- MeSH terms
- Acne Vulgaris, Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Drug Carriers, Female, Humans, Irritants, Liposomes, Male, Pilot Projects, Tretinoin, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review