Cited by 81Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsAdvancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryDermatology and Skin Diseases

Liposomal tretinoin for uncomplicated acne vulgaris

Sch�fer-Korting, M., Korting, H. C., Ponce-P�schl, E.·1994·The Clinical Investigator

Abstract

Frequently occurring skin irritancy and flare-up reactions impede the use of topical tretinoin for acne vulgaris due to poor patient compliance. Liposome encapsulation improves penetration into the skin and local tolerability in animals. We investigated efficacy and local tolerability of liposomal tretinoin in man. In a double-blind study 20 patients with uncomplicated acne vulgaris received liposomal tretinoin (0.01%) on one side of the body and a commercial gel preparation with either 0.025% or 0.05% on the other once daily for 10 weeks. Comedones and papules/pustules were counted every 2 (-4) weeks. Then also redness, scaling, and burning were rated according to a four-point scale. Moreover, the patients noted skin irritancy in a diary on a daily base. With conventional tretinoin the gels were equally efficacious and equally well tolerated. Liposomal tretinoin also appeared equipotent to the reference gels. There may even have been a slightly more rapid clearing of comedones following the liposome preparation. With respect to skin irritancy, however, liposomal tretinoin was superior. As rated by the patients, liposome encapsulated tretinoin induced less burning (mean cumulative score 2.7 +/- 1.2) than the 0.025% gel (16.1 +/- 7.1) and the 0.05% gel (9.7 +/- 4.1) gel and less erythema (1.8 +/- 0.7) than the 0.025% gel (11.4 +/- 3.8; (P < 0.05). Liposomal tretinoin was also better tolerated according to the rating by the investigator. Liposomal encapsulation of tretinoin all…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00577761

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review of the literature suggests that there is no conclusive evidence showing compromised skin always leads to greater penetration.

    “However, to date, a review of the literature suggests that there is no conclusive evidence showing compromised skin always lead to greater penetration (66).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sch�fer-Korting, M., Korting, H. C., & Ponce-P�schl, E.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
The Clinical Investigator
Published
1994-12
Volume
72
Issue
12
Pages
1086-1091
ISSN
  • 0946-2716 (ISSN-L)
  • 0941-0198
  • 1432-1440
OpenAlex
W2135431635
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
acne, topical tretinoin, liposome encapsulation, skin irritation, local tolerance, comedones, erythema, medication adherence, topical gel formulation
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Drug Carriers, Female, Humans, Irritants, Liposomes, Male, Pilot Projects, Tretinoin, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review