Cited by 61Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNeuroscience and Music Perception

Amplitude modulation thresholds for the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus)

Dooling, Robert J., Searcy, Margaret H.·1981·Journal of Comparative Physiology A

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00611177

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dooling, R. J., & Searcy, M. H.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
Published
1981
Volume
143
Issue
3
Pages
383-388
ISSN
  • 0340-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1351
OpenAlex
W1983708089
Cited by
61
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Comparative Physiology A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
amplitude modulation detection, parakeets, budgerigars, hearing threshold, modulation frequency, temporal resolution, frequency difference limen, sinusoidal modulation, broadband noise, avian hearing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review