Cited by 240Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorAvian ecology and behaviorMarine animal studies overview

The active space of red-winged blackbird song

Brenowitz, Eliot A.·1982·Journal of Comparative Physiology A

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00612017

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brenowitz, E. A.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Brenowitz, Eliot A.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
Published
1982
Volume
147
Issue
4
Pages
511-522
ISSN
  • 0340-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1351
OpenAlex
W2028650670
Cited by
240
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Comparative Physiology A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
red-winged blackbird, songs, active space, signal attenuation, song amplitude, background noise, signal-to-noise ratio, auditory detection thresholds, wind direction, spherical spreading, territory, acoustic communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review