Mechanical measures during maximal velocity knee extension exercise and their relation to fibre composition of the human vastus lateralis muscle
Abstract
A method for measuring the maximal velocity of knee extension exercise is described using a very light lever arm. Instrumentation of the lever arm with a potentiometer and accelerometer also allows for the measurement of peak acceleration, time to peak acceleration, the average rate of development of acceleration (jerk) and peak torque. With this apparatus and surface electromyography, electromechanical delay (EMD) was also determined. This apparatus was tested using 17 female and 10 male subjects, and the measures obtained were related to the percentage of fast twitch fibres (% FT) and the relative area of fast twitch fibres (% FTA) in the vastus lateralis determined from duplicate muscle biopsy samples. Peak velocity of unloaded knee extension averaged 12.1 +/- 1.2 and 12.2 +/- 1.7 rad.s-1 for females and males, respectively, and were not significantly different. As well, peak acceleration, time to peak acceleration jerk and EMD values were not significantly different between the female and male subjects, but the mean peak torque for the female subjects (73.5 +/- 14.7 N.m) was significantly lower than that for the males (98.4 +/- 31.5 N.m). Peak acceleration was significantly correlated with %FT (r = 0.40, P = 0.04) for the total subject population. None of the other measures was significantly related to either %FT or %FTA for the male and female subjects or the combined population of subjects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In response to tendon tap, both rectus femoris and vastus lateralis muscles are activated through monosynaptic networks.
“Previous studies have demonstrated that in response to tendon tap, both rectus femoris and vastus lateralis muscles are activated through monosynaptic networks [6].”
From Measurement of rectus femoris muscle velocities during patellar tendon jerk using vector tissue doppler imaging (2009) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Houston, M. E., Norman, R. W., & Froese, E. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Venue
- European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
- 0301-5548
- 1439-6327
- OpenAlex
- W1976272558
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- knee extension, peak velocity, vastus lateralis, fast-twitch fibres, fiber composition, electromechanical delay, peak torque, peak acceleration, jerk, sex differences, muscle fiber area
- MeSH terms
- Biomechanical Phenomena, Electrophysiology, Female, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Muscles, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review