Cited by 9Child Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchChild Welfare and Adoption

The Cyclical Pattern of Child Physical Abuse from a Psychoanalytic Self-Psychology Perspective

Cornett, Carlton·1985·Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00757474

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cornett, C.
Corresponding author
Cornett, Carlton
Venue
Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal
Published
1985
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
83-92
ISSN
  • 0738-0151 (ISSN-L)
  • 0738-0150
  • 1573-2797
OpenAlex
W2095204603
Cited by
9
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
child physical abuse, multigenerational transmission, psychoanalytic self psychology, empathy, developmental perspective

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review