CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Ethics in Business and EducationRegulation and Compliance StudiesMilitary and Defense Studies

The Defense Industry Initiative: Ethics, self-regulation, and accountability

Kurland, Nancy B.·1993·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/bf00871933
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00871933

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Defense Industry Initiative falls short of being an effective method of self-regulation.

    “These are good intentions, no doubt; yet according to a study of the Initiative's implementation, it ``falls short of being an effective method of self-regulation'' and ``reflect[s] the misplaced confidence that behavioral change will follow from mere ethical preaching and ethical modeling'' (Kurland 1993: 143, quoting Cressey & Moone 1983).”

    From Industry self-regulation: An institutional perspective (1997) · cites this paper as Kurland 1993: 143

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurland, N. B.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Kurland, Nancy B.
ORCID
Kurland, Nancy B.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1993-02
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
137-145
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1007/bf00871933
OpenAlex
W2010609024
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military and Defense Studies
Keywords
defense contracting, procurement fraud, ethics programs, self-regulation, corporate accountability, compliance monitoring, Reagan administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review