Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 521

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The social support appraisals (SS‐A) scale: Studies of reliability and validity

Vaux, Alan, Phillips, Jeffrey, Holly, Lori, Thomson, Brian, Williams, Deirdre, Stewart, Doreen·1986·American Journal of Community Psychology
DOI 10.1007/bf00911821
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ResumenEl objetivo de este artículo es adaptar y validar la Escala de Apoyo Social Subjetivo (EASS, de Vaux et al., 1986), a la vez que describir su estructura factorial.Esta escala está compuesta por 10 ítems distribuidos en dos dimensiones: apoyo familiar y apoyo de los amigos.Se examinan las propiedades psicométricas de la escala y la dimensionalidad de la misma en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios chilenos (N = 681).Los resultados indican que el EASS constituye un instrumento fiable (α = .86)y válido para la medición del apoyo social subjetivo.Las dimensiones de la EASS obtienen entre sí una correlación significativa y moderada (r = .41;p < .001).Las cargas factoriales para los ítems en el análisis factorial confirmatorio fluctuaron entre .40y .93,mostrando buenos índices de ajuste para el modelo de dos factores de primer orden correlacionados (CFI = .97,TLI = .93,

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00911821

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Barrerra M., 1981, Social networks and social support
  2. Gottlieb B., 1981, Social networks and social support
  3. Heller K., 1983, Preventive psychology: Theory, research and practice in community intervention
  4. Jackson D. N. (1973).Personality research form manual. New York Research Psychologists Press.
  5. Kaplan A. (1976).Social support: Construct and its measurement. Unpublished bachelor of art thesis Brown University.
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.127 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Shaul S. L. (1981).Loneliness: A comparison of two group counseling strategies with adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Washington.
  8. Turner R. J., 1983, Research in community mental health
  9. Vaux A. Burda P. Jr. & Stewart D. (in press). Orientation towards utilizing support resources.Journal of Community Psychology.
  10. Weiss R. S., 1974, Doing unto others

Cited by

See all 521

Metadata

Authors
Vaux, A., Phillips, J., Holly, L., Thomson, B., Williams, D., & Stewart, D.
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
195-218
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
DOI
10.1007/bf00911821
OpenAlex
W2060811384
Cited by
521
References
34
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.