Beyond structuralism and voluntarism: The politics and discourse of Progressive school reform, 1890?1930
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Progressive movement advocated what today seem to be contradictory initiatives.
“The Progressive movement advocated what today seem to be contradictory initiatives (Emirbayer, 1992).”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Emirbayer, 1992
A marked shift in educational philosophy between Cohort 2 and Cohort 6 was the Progressive movement in education, which peaked in the 1920s and whose most noted proponent was John Dewey.
“A marked shift in educational philosophy between Cohort 2 and Cohort 6 was the Progressive movement in education, which peaked in the 1920s and whose most noted proponent was John Dewey (Emirbayer, 1992).”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Emirbayer, 1992
Cohorts not only differ in quantitative aspects of education but often also have experienced qualitatively different educational systems.
“However, cohorts not only differ in such quantitative aspects of education but often also have experienced qualitatively different educational systems (e.g., shift from rote learning to more participatory strategies, such as discovery learning; see Emirbayer, 1992; Schaie, 2008) for which we unfortunately have not had any direct data.”
From Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study. (2011) · cites this paper as Emirbayer, 1992
Cites
Skocpol, T. (1985) · The Journal of Modern History · doi:10.1086/242778 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study.
Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., Hoppmann, C., Willis, S. L., & Schaie, K. W. (2011) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023426 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence
Schaie, K. W., Willis, S. L., & Pennak, S. (2005) · Research in Human Development · doi:10.1080/15427609.2005.9683344 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
- Authors
- Emirbayer, M.
- Affiliations
- The New School (US)
- Corresponding author
- Emirbayer, Mustafa
- ORCID
- Emirbayer, Mustafa
- Venue
- Theory and Society
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 621-664
- ISSN
- 0304-2421 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7853
- OpenAlex
- W2048857449
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Theory and Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Historical Education Studies Worldwide
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Historical Education and Society
- Keywords
- progressive education, educational reform, structuralism, voluntarism, politics of education, educational discourse, history of education, Progressive Era
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review