Nonlinear generalized Langevin equations

Zwanzig, Robert·1973·Journal of Statistical Physics

DOI 10.1007/bf01008729

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01008729

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers
Hänggi, P., Talkner, P., & Borkovec, M. (1990) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.62.251 · Cited by 6,154
Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion
Caldeira, A. O., & Leggett, A. J. (1983) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/0378-4371(83)90013-4 · Cited by 2,772
Current Status of Transition-State Theory
Truhlar, D. G., Garrett, B. C., & Klippenstein, S. J. (1996) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jp953748q · Cited by 2,279
On stochastic approaches of nuclear dynamics
Abe, Y., Ayik, S., Reinhard, P.-G., & Suraud, E. (1996) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(96)00003-8 · Cited by 440
Extracting macroscopic dynamics: model problems and algorithms
Givon, D., Kupferman, R., & Stuart, A. (2004) · Nonlinearity · doi:10.1088/0951-7715/17/6/r01 · Cited by 363
Reaction rate theory: What it was, where is it today, and where is it going?
Pollak, E., & Talkner, P. (2005) · Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.1858782 · Cited by 329
Nonequilibrium solvation effects on reaction rates for model SN2 reactions in water
Gertner, B. J., Wilson, K. R., & Hynes, J. T. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.455864 · Cited by 318
Quantum rates for a double well coupled to a dissipative bath: Accurate path integral results and comparison with approximate theories
Topaler, M., & Makri, N. (1994) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.468244 · Cited by 310
Quantum and classical Fokker-Planck equations for a Gaussian-Markovian noise bath
Tanimura, Y., & Wolynes, P. G. (1991) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.43.4131 · Cited by 224
Non-Markovian stochastic Schrödinger equation
Gaspard, P., & Nagaoka, M. (1999) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.479868 · Cited by 101
Diffusion of inert gases in silica sodalite: Importance of lattice flexibility
Kopelevich, D. I., & Chang, H.-C. (2001) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1414373 · Cited by 55
Understanding the Large Kinetic Isotope Effect of Hydrogen Tunneling in Condensed Phases by Using Double-Well Model Systems
Liu, Y., Yan, Y., Xing, T., & Shi, Q. (2021) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c02851 · Cited by 23
Osteocalcin binds to a GPRC6A Venus fly trap allosteric site to positively modulate GPRC6A signaling
Agarwal, R., Ye, R., Smith, M. D., Smith, J. C., Quarles, L. D., & Pi, M. (2024) · FASEB BioAdvances · doi:10.1096/fba.2024-00025 · Cited by 3

Authors: Zwanzig, R.
Venue: Journal of Statistical Physics
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1973-11
Volume: 9
Issue: 3
Pages: 215-220
ISSN: 0022-4715 (ISSN-L)
1572-9613
DOI: 10.1007/bf01008729
OpenAlex: W2009447971
Cited by: 1,415
References: 0
FWCI: 5.53
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review