Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonequilibrium solvation effects on reaction rates for model SN2 reactions in water

Gertner, Bradley J., Wilson, Kent R., Hynes, James T.·1989·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the model SN2 reaction Cl−+CH3Cl→ClCH3+Cl− in water, and variants thereof, are presented. The resulting transmission coefficients κ, that measure the deviations of the rates from the transition state theory (TST) rate predictions due to solvent-induced recrossings, are used to assess the validity of the generalized Langevin equation (GLE)-based Grote–Hynes (GH) theory. The GH predictions are found to agree with the MD results to within the error bars of the calculations for each of the 12 cases examined. This agreement extends from the nonadiabatic regime, where solvent molecule motions are unimportant and κ is determined by static solvent configurations at the transition state, into the polarization caging regime, where solvent motion is critical in determining κ. In contrast, the Kramers theory predictions for κ fall well below the simulation results. The friction kernel in the GLE used to evaluate the GH κ values is determined, from MD simulation, by a fixed-particle time correlation function of the force at the transition state. When this is expressed as a (Fourier) friction spectrum in frequency, marked similarities to the pure solvent spectrum are observed, and are used to identify the water solvent motions that determine the transmission coefficient κ. The deviations of κ from unity, the TST value, are dominated by solvent motions (translational and reorientational) which on the time scale of the recrossings are essentially static configurations. The deviations from the frozen solvent, nonadiabatic limit values κNA are dominated by the hinderd rotations (librations). Finally, the underlying assumptions of the GLE and the GH theory are discussed within the context of the simulation results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.455864

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Gertner, B. J., Wilson, K. R., & Hynes, J. T.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1989-04-01
Volume
90
Issue
7
Pages
3537-3558
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2014295466
Cited by
318
References
66
FWCI
24.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonequilibrium solvation effects on reaction rates for model SN2 reactions in water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.455864
The paper
Gertner, B. J., Wilson, K. R., & Hynes, J. T. (1989). Nonequilibrium solvation effects on reaction rates for model SN2 reactions in water. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.455864

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.