The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The CH formalism contains the Born rule as a special case and hence fulfils Assumption (Q). Since it also satisfies (S), it follows from Theorem 1 that it violates (C).”
From Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,621
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications.
Bharucha-Reid, A. T., & Feller, W. (1967) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2314609 · Cited by 6,365
Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
von Neumann, J. (2018) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400889921 · Cited by 5,072
"Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics
Everett, H. (1957) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.454 · Cited by 3,379
Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics
Offenbacher, E. L. (1955) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(55)90752-3 · Cited by 3,129
Schiff, L. I. (1949) · Cited by 3,018
Quantum Mechanics (Non-Relativistic Theory)
Elton, L. (1958) · Physics Bulletin · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/9/10/007 · Cited by 2,334
The philosophy of quantum mechanics
Jammer, M. (1974) · Cited by 1,495
Schiff, L. I., & Gardner, J. H. (1973) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1987309 · Cited by 1,454
The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Lev Vaidman, A. (2015) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400868056 · Cited by 1,054
Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement
Aharonov, Y., Bergmann, P. G., & Lebowitz, J. L. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.134.b1410 · Cited by 908
Wigner, E. P. (1963) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1969254 · Cited by 846
Gottfried, K. (1966) · Cited by 296
La théorie de l'observation en mécanique quantique
London, F., Bauer, E., & Langevin, P. (1939) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 116
Quantum theory of measurement without wave packet collapse
Cini, M. (1983) · Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B · doi:10.1007/bf02721505 · Cited by 104
Ballentine, L. E. (1973) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00708440 · Cited by 62
Is There a Quantum Measurement Problem?
Moldauer, P. A. (1972) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.5.1028 · Cited by 23
A note on the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics
Benioff, P. A. (1978) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00717501 · Cited by 5
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
Zurek, W. H. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.715 · Cited by 4,295
Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical
Zurek, W. H. (1991) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.881293 · Cited by 2,632
On gravity's role in quantum state reduction
Penrose, R. (1996) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/bf02105068 · Cited by 1,872
Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems
Viola, L., & Lloyd, S. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.58.2733 · Cited by 1,617
The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics
Plenio, M. B., & Knight, P. L. (1998) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.101 · Cited by 1,515
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Griffiths, Robert B.
- ORCID
- Griffiths, Robert B.
- Venue
- Journal of Statistical Physics
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 219-272
- ISSN
- 0022-4715 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9613
- OpenAlex
- W1965682166
- Cited by
- 1,138
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Statistical Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- consistent histories, interpretation of quantum mechanics, conditional probability, transition probabilities, consistency conditions, wave function collapse, measurement problem, closed quantum systems, time reversal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
