Cited by 108Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationGame Theory and Voting SystemsInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

The effect of the secret ballot on voter turnout rates

Heckelman, Jac C.·1995·Public Choice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01047732

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heckelman (1995) conjectures that electoral turnout falls as a consequence of the secret ballot.

    “Heckelman (1995) conjectures that electoral turnout falls as a consequence of the secret ballot.”

    From From Open to Secret Ballot: Vote Buying and Modernization (2012) · cites this paper as Heckelman (1995)

  • The secret ballot reduces electoral turnout by eliminating the vote market and one reason to vote, as demonstrated by Heckelman (1995).

    “The logic behind this hypothesis is, we recall, that the secret ballot, by and large, eliminates the vote market and with it one reason to vote.This reduces electoral turnout, as …rst pointed out and demonstrated empirically by Heckelman (1995).”

    From From Open to Secret Ballot: Vote Buying and Modernization (2012) · cites this paper as Heckelman (1995)

  • In US states, the secret ballot has a significant negative effect on turnout, reproducing Heckelman (1995).

    “In column 1, we reproduce Heckelman's (1995) …nding that the secret ballot has a signi…cant, negative e¤ect on turnout, consistent with the hypothesis that before the secret ballot turnout is kept high because of vote buying.”

    From From Open to Secret Ballot: Vote Buying and Modernization (2012) · cites this paper as Heckelman (1995)

  • In some US states, the secret ballot was not initially applied uniformly throughout the entire state.

    “In some states, e.g., Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Tennessee, Texas, Missouri, and Wisconsin, the secret ballot was not initially applied uniformly throughout the entire state and the coding of these cases follow Heckelman (1995).”

    From From Open to Secret Ballot: Vote Buying and Modernization (2012) · cites this paper as Heckelman (1995)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heckelman, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Heckelman, Jac C.
Venue
Public Choice
Published
1995-01
Volume
82
Issue
1-2
Pages
107-124
ISSN
  • 0048-5829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7101
OpenAlex
W2093419433
Cited by
108
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public Choice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
secret ballot, voter turnout, vote buying, rational voter model, voting costs, electoral law, gubernatorial elections, political parties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review