Cited by 648Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPharmaceutical studies and practicesAnimal testing and alternatives

Interspecies scaling, allometry, physiological time, and the ground plan of pharmacokinetics

Boxenbaum, Harold·1982·Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01062336

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boxenbaum, H.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Boxenbaum, Harold
Venue
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics
Published
1982-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
201-227
ISSN
0090-466X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042099048
Cited by
648
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
Keywords
interspecies scaling, allometry, body size, physiological time, creatinine clearance, interspecies variation, drug metabolism, longevity
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Creatinine, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Kinetics, Liver, Research Design, Species Specificity, Statistics as Topic, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review