Cited by 40Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The hyperactive spontaneously hypertensive rat learns to sit still, but not to stop bursts of responses with short interresponse times.

Wultz, Boaz, Sagvolden, Terje·1992·Behavior Genetics

Abstract

The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) is hyperactive and has been proposed as an animal model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although ADHD in most cases is treated with central stimulants, behavior therapy has also been used, but with relatively limited success. The purpose of the present study was to investigate suppression of SHR hyperactivity by differentially reinforcing immobility (DRI) using a positive reinforcer. The DRI schedule required that the rat remain immobile in a particular part of an operant chamber, the target, in order to obtain the reinforcer. The time requirement, the DRI value, of these periods was increased progressively. The results showed that time spent on the target increased by increasing DRI value in both hyperactive and control rats. However, the total number of movements, on as well as outside the target, was higher for the hyperactive rats. The behavior grouped into two independent response components. One component consisted of immobility responses with durations less than 1 s, actually bursts of active responses; the other component consisted of immobility responses with durations more or less matching the DRI requirement. The reinforcement schedule modified the long-lasting immobility component in both groups. SHR received more reinforcers than WKY as long as the schedule did not require too long periods of immobility. However, the total number of movements on target was not reduced in SHR; on the contrary, it increas…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01066613

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SHR rats show deficits in sustained attention, motor impulsiveness, and hyperactivity in a novel environment.

    “SHR rats show deficits in sustained attention, motor impulsiveness, and hyperactivity in a novel environment (Knardahl and Sagvolden, 1979; Sagvolden et al., 1992, 2005b; Wultz and Sagvolden, 1992; Sagvolden, 2000).”

    From The Effects of Methylphenidate on Goal-directed Behavior in a Rat Model of ADHD (2015) · cites this paper as Wultz and Sagvolden, 1992

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wultz, B., & Sagvolden, T.
Affiliations
University of Oslo (NO)
Venue
Behavior Genetics
Published
1992-07
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
415-433
ISSN
  • 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3297
OpenAlex
W2035523609
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
spontaneously hypertensive rats, hyperactivity, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, animal model of ADHD, immobility, behavior therapy, reinforcement schedules, interresponse time, movement behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Motor Activity, Rats, Inbred SHR, Rats, Inbred WKY, Reinforcement Schedule, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review