Cited by 81Science Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching MethodsInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Pausing phenomena: Influence on the quality of instruction

Rowe, Mary Budd·1974·Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01069238

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowe, M. B.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Rowe, Mary Budd
Venue
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
Published
1974-07
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
203-224
ISSN
  • 0090-6905 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6555
OpenAlex
W2080502378
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
waiting time, teacher questioning, student response, elementary school science, student language development, logical development, classroom discourse, teacher-student relationship, teacher expectations, inquiry-based learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review