The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of the logit scaling approach to test for rank-order and fatigue effects in stated preference data
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Meta-analysis of UK values of travel time: An update
Abrantes, P. A. L., & Wardman, M. R. (2011) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2010.08.003 · Cited by 326
A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs
Swait, J. (2001) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/s0191-2615(00)00030-8 · Cited by 326
Combining revealed and stated preferences data
Ben-Akiva, M., Bradley, M., Morikawa, T., Benjamin, J., Novak, T., Oppewal, H., & Rao, V. (1994) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/bf00999209 · Cited by 262
Self-citationNot bored yet – Revisiting respondent fatigue in stated choice experiments
Hess, S., Hensher, D. A., & Daly, A. (2012) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.008 · Cited by 154
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradley, M., & Daly, A.
- Venue
- Transportation
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-184
- ISSN
- 0049-4488 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9435
- OpenAlex
- W2044817941
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of the logit scaling approach to test for rank-order and fatigue effects in stated preference data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf01098791
- The paper
- Bradley, M., & Daly, A. (1994). Use of the logit scaling approach to test for rank-order and fatigue effects in stated preference data. Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01098791
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
