The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Not bored yet – Revisiting respondent fatigue in stated choice experiments
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-report measures have drawbacks such as respondent fatigue and socially desirable responding.
“The study relied on self-report measures which have a number of drawbacks, such as respondent fatigue and socially desirable responding (Hess, Hensher & Daly, 2012;Helmes and Holden, 2003).”
From Better living with illness: A transdiagnostic acceptance and commitment therapy group intervention for chronic physical illness (2016) · cites this paper as Hess, Hensher & Daly, 2012
The Introduction describes fatigue as a possible problem in repeated stated-choice surveys: respondents may become less engaged or make mistakes. But the Abstract and Conclusions report no clear decreasing trend across choice tasks and say concerns about fatigue may be overstated. The paper therefore supports fatigue as a potential concern in that setting, not as an established drawback of self-report measures generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P. C., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. J. (1998) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.2307/3180269 · Cited by 1,401
Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates
Caussade, S., Ortúzar, J. D. D., Rizzi, L. I., & Hensher, D. A. (2004) · Transportation Research Part B Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2004.07.006 · Cited by 570
Self-citationBech, M., Kjær, T., & Lauridsen, J. T. (2010) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1587 · Cited by 261
Bradley, M., & Daly, A. (1994) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/bf01098791 · Cited by 244
Self-citationModelling Recreation Demand Using Choice Experiments: Climbing in Scotland
Hanley, N. D., Wright, R. E., & Koop, G. M. (2002) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1016077425039 · Cited by 240
Bateman, I. J., Burgess, D. E., Hutchinson, G., & Matthews, D. I. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.08.003 · Cited by 211
Estimation and testing in the random effects probit model
Guilkey, D. K., & Murphy, J. L. (1993) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(93)90028-4 · Cited by 208
Investigating the distribution of the value of travel time savings
Fosgerau, M. (2005) · Transportation Research Part B Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2005.09.007 · Cited by 201
Learning and fatigue during choice experiments: a comparison of online and mail survey modes
Savage, S. J., & Waldman, D. M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.984 · Cited by 199
Measuring What People Value: A Comparison of “Attitude” and “Preference” Surveys
Phillips, K. A., Johnson, F. R., & Maddala, T. (2002) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.01116 · Cited by 191
The first time is the hardest: A test of ordering effects in choice experiments
Carlsson, F., Mørkbak, M. R., & Olsen, S. B. (2012) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70051-4 · Cited by 180
Non-trading, lexicographic and inconsistent behaviour in stated choice data
Hess, S., Rose, J. M., & Polak, J. W. (2010) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.008 · Cited by 149
Self-citationChoice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments
Brouwer, R., Dekker, T., Rolfe, J. C., & Windle, J. (2009) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9337-x · Cited by 144
Gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments: Evidence from an empirical study
Ladenburg, J., & Olsen, S. B. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.01.004 · Cited by 126
Holmes, T. P., & Boyle, K. J. (2005) · Land Economics · doi:10.3368/le.81.1.114 · Cited by 99
Attribute Processing, Heuristics and Preference Construction in Choice Analysis
Hensher, D. A. (2010) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/9781849507738-003 · Cited by 91
Self-citationForecasting the demand for an employee Park and Ride service using commuters' stated choices
Hole, A. R. (2004) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.04.003 · Cited by 55
Review of "Bay Area/California High-Speed Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecasting Study"
Brownstone, D. M., Hansen, M. M., & Madanat, S. M. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 26
Managed-Lanes Stated Preference Survey in Atlanta, Georgia
Hess, S., Smith, C. A., Falzarano, S., & Stubits, J. (2008) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2049-17 · Cited by 24
Self-citationRespondent Behavior in Discrete Choice Modeling with a Focus on the Valuation of Travel Time Savings
Hensher, D. A., & Rose, J. M. (2005) · Journal of transportation and statistics · Cited by 14
Self-citationEffects of Endogenous Task Complexity and the Endowed Bundle on Stated ChoicePreprint
Hu, W., & Hu, W. (2006) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.21437 · Cited by 7
Choice set awareness and ordering effects in choice experiments
Bateman, I. J., Carson, R., Day, B., Dupont, D., Louviere, J. J., Morimoto, S., Riccardo Scarpa, A., & Wang, R. (2008) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 5
Raffaelli, R., Notaro, S., Riccardo Scarpa, A., Pihlens, D., & Jordan, L. (2009) · Cited by 1
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bliemer, M.C., Rose, J.M., 2009. Designing stated choice experiments: the state of the art. In: Kitamura, R., Yoshi, T., Yamamoto, T. (Eds.), The Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research, Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, pp. 495–498 (Chapter 25).
- Daly, A., Hess, S., 2010. Simple methods for panel data analysis. In: Paper Presented at the European Transport Conference, Glasgow.
- Orr, S., Hess, S., Sheldon, R., 2010. Fungibility of monetary valuations in a transport context: an empirical investigation of the transferability of willingness to pay measures. In: Paper Presented at the European Transport Conference, Glasgow.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China
Helveston, J. P., Liu, Y., Feit, E. M., Fuchs, E. R. H., Klampfl, E., & Michalek, J. J. (2015) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.002 · Cited by 528
Bech, M., Kjær, T., & Lauridsen, J. T. (2010) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1587 · Cited by 261
Hoek, A. C., Pearson, D. H., James, S. W., Lawrence, M. A., & Friel, S. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.12.008 · Cited by 219
CRISPR versus GMOs: Public acceptance and valuation
Shew, A. M., Nalley, L. L., Snell, H. A., Nayga, R. M., & Dixon, B. L. (2018) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2018.10.005 · Cited by 222
Rakotonarivo, O. S., Schaafsma, M., & Hockley, N. J. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.032 · Cited by 223
Values of travel time in Europe: Review and meta-analysis
Wardman, M. R., Chintakayala, P. K., & de Jong, G. (2016) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.019 · Cited by 199
The first time is the hardest: A test of ordering effects in choice experiments
Carlsson, F., Mørkbak, M. R., & Olsen, S. B. (2012) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70051-4 · Cited by 180
Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services
Faccioli, M., Czajkowski, M., Glenk, K., & Martín-Ortega, J. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106600 · Cited by 157
Perception towards electric vehicles and the impact on consumers’ preference
Ghasri, M., Ardeshiri, A., & Rashidi, T. H. (2019) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.003 · Cited by 137
Loose, S. M., & Lockshin, L. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.02.002 · Cited by 118
Jonker, M. F., Donkers, B., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., & Stolk, E. A. (2018) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3846 · Cited by 120
Jones, L. R., Cherry, C., Vũ, T. A., & Nguyen, Q. N. (2013) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.09.003 · Cited by 110
Danielis, R., Rotaris, L., Giansoldati, M., & Scorrano, M. (2020) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2020.04.004 · Cited by 108
New insights on random regret minimization models
van Cranenburgh, S., Guevara, C. Á., & Chorus, C. G. (2015) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.008 · Cited by 112
Czajkowski, M., Giergiczny, M., & Greene, W. H. (2014) · Land Economics · doi:10.3368/le.90.2.324 · Cited by 102
Cherchi, E., & Hensher, D. A. (2015) · Transportation research procedia · doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.013 · Cited by 97
Self-citationAddressing empirical challenges related to the incentive compatibility of stated preferences methods
Czajkowski, M., Vossler, C. A., Budziński, W., Wiśniewska, A., & Zawojska, E. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.023 · Cited by 86
Effect of Level Overlap and Color Coding on Attribute Non-Attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments
Jonker, M. F., Donkers, B., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., & Stolk, E. A. (2017) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.002 · Cited by 76
Cue versus independent food attributes: the effect of adding attributes in choice experiments
Caputo, V., Riccardo Scarpa, A., & Nayga, R. M. (2016) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbw022 · Cited by 75
Menegaki, A. N., Olsen, S. B., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2016) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2016.04.005 · Cited by 74
Grilli, G., & Notaro, S. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.103 · Cited by 72
The Influence of Design Dimensions on Stated Choices in an Environmental Context
Meyerhoff, J., Oehlmann, M., & Weller, P. (2014) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-014-9797-5 · Cited by 69
Learning, fatigue and preference formation in discrete choice experiments
Campbell, D., Boeri, M., Doherty, E., & Hutchinson, G. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.08.018 · Cited by 70
Choice certainty in Discrete Choice Experiments: Will eye tracking provide useful measures?
Uggeldahl, K. C., Jacobsen, C., Lundhede, T., & Olsen, S. B. (2016) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2016.09.002 · Cited by 66
Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods
McFadden, D. L., & Train, K. (2017) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781786434692 · Cited by 66
Valuing the benefits of an afforestation project in a peri-urban area with choice experiments
Vecchiato, D., & Tempesta, T. (2012) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.001 · Cited by 61
Learning affects top down and bottom up modulation of eye movements in decision making
Orquin, J. L., Bagger, M. P., & Loose, S. M. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004733 · Cited by 59
Brassington, L., Ferreira, N. B., Yates, S., Fearn, J., Lanza, P., Kemp, K., & Gillanders, D. (2016) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.09.001 · Cited by 59
Uncovering context-induced status quo effects in choice experiments
Oehlmann, M., Meyerhoff, J., Mariel, P., & Weller, P. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.002 · Cited by 56
Matthews, Y., Riccardo Scarpa, A., & Marsh, D. (2017) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.031 · Cited by 57
Are we done yet? Response fatigue and rural livelihoods
Ambler, K., Herskowitz, S. R., & Maredia, M. K. (2020) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102736 · Cited by 54
Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment
Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2015) · OECD environment working papers · doi:10.1787/5jrp6w76tstg-en · Cited by 53
Mamine, F., Farès, M., & Minviel, J. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106721 · Cited by 54
Ordering effects in discrete choice experiments: A systematic literature review across domains
Boxebeld, S. (2024) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100489 · Cited by 51
Tibesigwa, B., Ntuli, H., & Lokina, R. B. (2020) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102853 · Cited by 51
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments
Collacott, H., Soekhai, V., Thomas, C., Brooks, A. B., Brookes, E., Lo, R., Mulnick, S., & Heidenreich, S. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00520-4 · Cited by 50
Buckell, J., & Hess, S. (2019) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.03.011 · Cited by 48
Self-citationBen-Elia, E., Ishaq, R., & Shiftan, Y. (2012) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-012-9426-5 · Cited by 42
Buckell, J., & Sindelar, J. L. (2019) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.14610 · Cited by 42
Value of labeling credence attributes—common structures and individual preferences
Dahlhausen, J. L., Rungie, C., & Roosen, J. (2018) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12456 · Cited by 41
Šalak, B., Kienast, F., Olschewski, R., Spielhofer, R., Hayek, U. W., Grêt‐Regamey, A., & Hunziker, M. (2022) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.154 · Cited by 36
Khanal, U., Wilson, C., Lee, B. L., & Hoang, V.-N. V. (2017) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2017.1389688 · Cited by 34
Hypothetical bias and decision-rule effect in modelling discrete directional choices
Haghani, M., & Sarvi, M. (2018) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.012 · Cited by 31
Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products
Ardeshiri, A., Sampson, S., & Swait́, J. (2019) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.06.004 · Cited by 31
Gannod, G. C., Abbott, K. H., Haitsma, K. S. V., Martindale, N., & Heppner, A. (2018) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gny056 · Cited by 30
Damigos, D., Tentes, G., Balzarini, M., Furlanis, F., & Vianello, A. (2017) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2016wr020281 · Cited by 30
Exploring consumer preferences in cloud archiving – a student's perspective
Burda, D., & Teuteberg, F. (2015) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2015.1012650 · Cited by 28
Stated preference surveys in transport demand modeling: disengagement of respondents
Petrik, O., Silva, J. D. A. E., & Moura, F. (2015) · Transportation Letters · doi:10.1179/1942787515y.0000000003 · Cited by 27
Public preferences for controlling an invasive species in public and private spaces
Rolfe, J. C., & Windle, J. (2014) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.013 · Cited by 27
Schuir, J., & Teuteberg, F. (2021) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-021-00529-0 · Cited by 26
Modeling travel mode choice and characterizing freight transport in a Brazilian context
de Souza, F. L. U., Larrañaga, A. M., Palma, D., & Pitombo, C. S. (2021) · Transportation Letters · doi:10.1080/19427867.2021.1976011 · Cited by 26
Learning how to choose—effects of instructional choice sets in discrete choice experiments
Meyerhoff, J., & Glenk, K. (2015) · Resource and Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.04.006 · Cited by 29
Kim, H., Shoji, Y., Tsuge, T., Aikoh, T., & Kuriyama, K. (2019) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102086 · Cited by 26
Abay, K. A., Berhane, G., Hoddinott, J. F., & Tafere, K. (2022) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/nxac153 · Cited by 22
Oliveira, G. R. D. C., & Dias, L. C. (2020) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03584-x · Cited by 21
Hensher, D. A. (2013) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9459-4 · Cited by 21
Self-citationSalimy, M. S., Humphrey, T. J., Katakam, A., Melnic, C. M., Heng, M. M., & Bedair, H. S. (2022) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000002358 · Cited by 20
König, L. M., Giese, H., Schupp, H. T., & Renner, B. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01301 · Cited by 22
Some Unfortunate Consequences of Non-Randomized, Grouped-Item Survey Administration in IS Research
Wilson, E. V., & Lankton, N. K. (2012) · International Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 20
Consumer preferences for beef quality grades on imported and domestic beef
Gao, S., Grebitus, C., & DeLong, K. L. (2023) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbad009 · Cited by 19
Measuring patient satisfaction with medical services using social media generated data
Geletta, S. (2018) · International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance · doi:10.1108/ijhcqa-12-2016-0183 · Cited by 18
Clicking vs. Dragging: Different Uses of the Mouse and Their Implications for Online Surveys
Sikkel, D., Steenbergen, R., & Gras, S. (2014) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nft077 · Cited by 18
Marti, J., Bachhuber, M. A., Feingold, J. H., Meads, D. M., Richards, M. R., & Hennessy, S. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016229 · Cited by 17
Petrontino, A., Frem, M., Fucilli, V., Tria, E., Campobasso, A. A., & Bozzo, F. (2024) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1367362 · Cited by 17
Are Malaysians eager to use their cars less? Forecasting mode choice behaviors under new policies
Kaffashi, S., Shamsudin, M. N., Clark, M. S., Sidique, S. F., Bazrbachi, A., Radam, A., Adam, S. U., & Rahim, K. A. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.005 · Cited by 17
Hess, S., & Giergiczny, M. (2014) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-014-9769-9 · Cited by 17
Self-citationGao, S., Grebitus, C., & DeLong, K. L. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · doi:10.1111/cjag.12359 · Cited by 16
Testing the consistency of preferences in discrete choice experiments: an eye tracking study
Segovia, M. S., & Palma, M. A. (2020) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbaa024 · Cited by 16
Alekh, V., Vennila, V., Nair, R., Susmitha, V., Muraleedharan, A., Alkoyak-Yildiz, M., Akshay, N., & Bhavani, R. R. (2018) · FabLearn Europe Conference on Creativity and Making in Education (FabLearn Europe) · doi:10.1145/3213818.3213830 · Cited by 19
Buckell, J., Vasavada, V., Wordsworth, S., Regier, D. A., & Quaife, M. (2021) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4455 · Cited by 15
Forbes-Brown, S., Micheels, E. T., & Hobbs, J. E. (2016) · Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing · doi:10.1080/08974438.2015.1054542 · Cited by 15
Assessing Response Fatigue in Phone Surveys: Experimental Evidence on Dietary Diversity in Ethiopia
Abay, K. A., Berhane, G., Hoddinott, J. F., & Tafere, K. (2021) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-9636 · Cited by 15
Buckell, J., Hensher, D. A., & Hess, S. (2020) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4173 · Cited by 14
Self-citationSeen but not considered? Awareness and consideration in choice analysis
Edenbrandt, A. K., Lagerkvist, C. J., Lüken, M., & Orquin, J. L. (2022) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100375 · Cited by 14
Panchalingam, T., & Shi, Y. (2022) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107288 · Cited by 15
Teh, H. S., Woon, Y. L., Leong, C. T., Hing, N. Y. L., Mien, T. Y. S., Roope, L. S. J., Clarke, P., Lim, L., & Buckell, J. (2022) · The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific · doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100534 · Cited by 17
Product availability in discrete choice experiments with private goods
Chavez, D., Palma, M. A., Nayga, R. M., & Mjelde, J. W. (2020) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2020.100225 · Cited by 13
Classical Music Concert Attendance and Older Adults
Tong, E., White, C. J., & Fry, T. R. L. (2016) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.18666/jlr-2016-v48-i2-6437 · Cited by 12
To ‘Vape’ or Smoke? A Discrete Choice Experiment Among U.S. Adult Smokers
Marti, J., Buckell, J., Maclean, J. C., & Sindelar, J. L. (2016) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w22079 · Cited by 12
The impacts of packaging on preferences for cannabis edibles: A discrete choice experiment
Cooper, M., & Shi, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104453 · Cited by 11
Energy Demand Management and Social Norms
Gołębiowska, B., Bartczak, A., & Czajkowski, M. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13153779 · Cited by 11
Schüler, J., Anderson, B. S., Murnieks, C. Y., Baum, M., & Küsshauer, A. (2023) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587231184071 · Cited by 10
Review: Preference elicitation methods for appropriate breeding objectives
Burns, J. G., Eory, V., Butler, A., Simm, G., & Wall, E. (2022) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2022.100535 · Cited by 10
Mugobo, V. V., & Ntuli, H. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141710887 · Cited by 14
Eye tracking to explore attendance in health-state descriptions
Nicolet, A., & Krabbe, P. F. M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190111 · Cited by 9
Kulesz, M. M., Lundh, T., de Koning, D., & Lagerkvist, C. J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222494 · Cited by 9
Analyzing Consumer Reviews with Text Mining Approach
Dasgupta, S., & Sengupta, K. (2016) · Paradigm A Management Research Journal · doi:10.1177/0971890716637700 · Cited by 9
A Multidimensional Needs Assessment of Social Emotional Learning Skill Areas
Yopp, A. M., McKim, B. R., Moore, L. L., Odom, S. F., & Hanagriff, R. D. (2017) · Journal of Agricultural Education · doi:10.5032/jae.2017.01186 · Cited by 12
Czajkowski, M., Giergiczny, M., & Greene, W. H. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 9
Balancing quietness and freedom: Support for reducing road noise among park visitors
Rice, W. L., Newman, P., Zipp, K. Y., Taff, B. D., Pipkin, A. R., Miller, Z. D., & Pan, B. (2021) · Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism · doi:10.1016/j.jort.2021.100474 · Cited by 8
Human decision-making in a non-ergodic additive environment
Vanhoyweghen, A., & Ginis, V. (2023) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2023.0544 · Cited by 8
Travel behavior and system dynamics in a simple gamified automated multimodal network
Collins, M., Etzioni, S. B. Z., & Ben-Elia, E. (2024) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2024.104060 · Cited by 9
Araya, F., Faust, K. M., & Kaminsky, J. (2020) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102114 · Cited by 8
Emang, D., Lundhede, T., & Thorsen, B. J. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1268525 · Cited by 8
Demand for Price Insurance among Farmers in India: A Choice Experiment-based Approach
Ranganathan, T., Gaurav, S., & Singh, A. K. (2016) · Margin The Journal of Applied Economic Research · doi:10.1177/0973801015625266 · Cited by 8
Teh, H. S., Woon, Y. L., Leong, C. T., Hing, N. Y. L., Mien, T. Y. S., Roope, L. S. J., Clarke, P., Lim, L., & Buckell, J. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4057234 · Cited by 8
Lagerkvist, C. J., Heß, S., & Johansson, H. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6100084 · Cited by 7
A Stated Preference Study of the Chesapeake Bay and Watershed LakesPreprint
Moore, C. C., Guignet, D., Maguire, K. B., Dockins, C., & Simon, N. B. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.280929 · Cited by 7
Steps of a Discrete Choice Experiment
Mariel, P., Campbell, D., Sandorf, E. D., Meyerhoff, J., Vega‐Bayo, A., & Blevins, R. (2025) · The Economics of non-market goods and resources · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89338-4_2 · Cited by 6
Nguyen, L., Jokimäki, H., Linnosmaa, I., Saloniki, E., Batchelder, L., Malley, J., Lu, H., Burge, P., Trukeschitz, B., & Forder, J. (2021) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/23814683211027902 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Hess, S., Hensher, D. A., & Daly, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hess, Stephane
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 626-644
- ISSN
- 0965-8564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1528665762
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 24.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Transportation Research Board 91st Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G033609/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- respondent fatigue, stated choice experiment, survey length, scale heterogeneity, mixed logit model, logit model, revealed preference survey, respondent engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
