Cited by 43Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Religious change and alcohol use: An application of reference group and socialization theory

Beeghley, Leonard, Bock, E. Wilbur, Cochran, John K.·1990·Sociological Forum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01112595

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 145 alcohol studies with the best methodology, 131 (90%) reported inverse relationships and only one study found a positive relationship.

    “Of the 145 studies with the best methodology, 131 (90%) reported inverse relationships [206–221] and only one study found a positive relationship [222].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beeghley, L., Bock, E. W., & Cochran, J. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Venue
Sociological Forum
Published
1990-06
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
261-278
ISSN
  • 0884-8971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7861
OpenAlex
W2070606174
Cited by
43
References
38
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociological Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
religious change, religiosity, alcohol consumption, reference group theory, socialization theory, religious behavior, everyday life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review