Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classical and quantum scattering on a spinning cone

de Sousa Gerbert, P., Jackiw, R.·1989·Communications in Mathematical Physics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01219196

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 't Hooft, G.: Commun. Math. Phys.117, 685 (1988) · DOI
  2. Deser, S., Jackiw, R.: Commun. Math. Phys.118, 495 (1988) · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gott, J.: Ap. J.288, 422 (1985); for a review see Vilenkin, A.: Phys. Rep.121, 263 (1985). The spinning cosmic string was considered by Mazur, P.: Phys. Rev.D34, 1925 (1986), and simultaneously to our work by Harari, D. and Polychronakos, A.: Phys. Rev.D38, 3320 (1988) · DOI · Paper page
  4. The generalization to arbitrary numbers of spinning point particles is given by Clément, G.: Int. J. Theor. Phys.24, 281 (1985), who also studies classical motion · DOI
  5. Sommerfeld, A.: Math. Ann,47, 317 (1896) and Optics. New York, NY: Academic Press 1954 · DOI · Paper page
  6. We see no reason for energy to be quantized or timet to be periodic as has been claimed by Mazur, P.: Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 929 (1986). Our objections to the reasoning in that paper coincide with those raised by Samuel, J., Iyer, B.: Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2379 (1987) and are apparently accepted by Mazur, P.: Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2380 (1987) · DOI
  7. Wigner, E.: Phys. Rev.98, 145 (1955) · DOI
  8. A mathematical investigation of Dirac operators on spaces with conical singularities is by Chou, A.: Trans. Am. Math. Soc.289 1 (1985) · DOI
  9. Deser, S., Jackiw, R., Templeton, S.: Ann Phys. (NY)140, 372 (1982) The normalization in (5.4) is chosen so that a well-defined zero mass limit may be taken. But recall that the interpretation of the massless theory is quite different, as might be expected since spin is discontinuous whenm passes through zero. A redefinition of the fields in the massless Dirac theory $$\phi (k)e^{ikr} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\sqrt {k_x - ik_y } } & 0 \\ 0 & {\sqrt {k_x + ik_y } } \\ \end{array} } \right)\exp \left\{ {\frac{\pi }{4}\hat k^i \sigma ^i } \right\}\psi _k^0 (r)$$ exhibits their almost scalar nature, with discontinuous behaviour under rotationR ? , $$\phi (k)\xrightarrow[{R_\theta }]{}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} { \phi (R_\theta ^{ - 1} k) if 0 \leqq \theta \leqq 2\pi } \\ { - \phi (R_\theta ^{ - 1} k) if 2\pi< \theta< 4\pi } \\ \end{array} } \right.$$ because the functions $$\sqrt {k_x \mp ik_y } $$ are double-valued; see Binegar, B.: J. Math. Phys.23, 1511 (1982). Parity is not violated in this case · DOI · Paper page
  10. Similar problems have been studied in monopole physics by Goldhaber, A.: Phys. Rev.D16, 1815 (1977) and Callias, C.: Phys. Rev.D16, 3068 (1977), who found that thes-wave radial Dirac Hamiltonian is not self-adjoint. Chou in ref. 9 recognized the possible loss of self-adjointness of the Dirac operator on conical spaces, but did not study extensions
  11. Alvarez-Gaumé, L., Della Pietra, S., Moore, G.: Ann. Phys. (NY)163, 288 (1985); Goni, M., Valle, M.: Phys. Rev.D34, 648 (1986); Vuorio, I.: Phys. Lett.B175, 176 (1986) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Deser, S., Jackiw, R., Templeton, S.: Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 975 (1982) and Ann. Phys. (NY)140, 372 (1982 · DOI

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
de Sousa Gerbert, P., & Jackiw, R.
Venue
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Published
1989-06
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
229-260
ISSN
  • 0010-3616 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0916
OpenAlex
W2011358479
Cited by
273
References
1
FWCI
28.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.