Cited by 25Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

A construction of two-dimensional quantum chromodynamics

Klimek, S?awomir, Kondracki, Witold·1987·Communications in Mathematical Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01221253

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klimek, S., & Kondracki, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Institute of Mathematics (PL)
Venue
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Published
1987-09
Volume
113
Issue
3
Pages
389-402
ISSN
  • 0010-3616 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0916
OpenAlex
W2077973576
Cited by
25
References
8
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Communications in Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
two-dimensional quantum chromodynamics, SU(2) gauge theory, functional measure, Wilson loops, 1+1 dimensions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review