Cited by 2,396Geometric and Algebraic TopologyBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology

Topological quantum field theory

Witten, Edward·1988·Communications in Mathematical Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01223371

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Witten, E.
Affiliations
Institute for Advanced Study (US)
Corresponding author
Witten, Edward
Venue
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Published
1988-09
Volume
117
Issue
3
Pages
353-386
ISSN
  • 0010-3616 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0916
OpenAlex
W2164252329
Cited by
2,396
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 62
FWCI
100.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Communications in Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Keywords
topological field theory, supersymmetric gauge theories, twisted supersymmetry, Donaldson invariants, 4-manifolds, Floer homology, 3-manifolds, low-dimensional topology, general covariance, topological excitations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review