Gender differences in scripts for different types of dates
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Romantic and sexual partnering is shaped by stratified cultural expectations or scripts and social norms.
“romantic and sexual partnering is shaped by stratified cultural expectations or scripts and social norms .”
From The role of culture in explaining college students’ selection into hookups, dates, and long-term romantic relationships (2016) · cites this paper as Alksnis et al., 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kuperberg, A., & Padgett, J. E. (2016) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407515616876 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Kuperberg, A., & Padgett, J. E. (2015) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.901284 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Kuperberg, A., & Allison, R. (2018) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_23 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alksnis, C., Desmarais, S., & Wood, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Venue
- Sex Roles
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 321-336
- ISSN
- 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2762
- OpenAlex
- W2041699855
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- gender differences, dating experiences, sexual intimacy, scripts, sexual scripts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
