The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lattice basis reduction: Improved practical algorithms and solving subset sum problems
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
NTRU: A ring-based public key cryptosystem
Hoffstein, J., Pipher, J., & Silverman, J. H. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054868 · Cited by 1,947
Better Key Sizes (and Attacks) for LWE-Based Encryption
Lindner, R., & Peikert, C. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19074-2_21 · Cited by 688
Survey on Fully Homomorphic Encryption, Theory, and Applications
Marcolla, C., Sucasas, V., Manzano, M., Bassoli, R., Fitzek, F. H. P., & Aaraj, N. (2022) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2022.3205665 · Cited by 323
Status report on the third round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization process
Alagic, G., Apon, D., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Dang, T., Kelsey, J., Lichtinger, J., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C., Moody, D., et al. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8413-upd1 · Cited by 301
On post-processing in the quantum algorithm for computing short discrete logarithms
Ekerå, M. (2020) · Designs, Codes and Cryptography · doi:10.1007/s10623-020-00783-2 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Schnorr, C. P., & Euchner, M.
- Venue
- Mathematical Programming
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 181-199
- ISSN
- 0025-5610 (ISSN-L)
- 1436-4646
- OpenAlex
- W2126483728
- Cited by
- 1,427
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lattice basis reduction: Improved practical algorithms and solving subset sum problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf01581144
- The paper
- Schnorr, C. P., & Euchner, M. (1994). Lattice basis reduction: Improved practical algorithms and solving subset sum problems. Mathematical Programming. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01581144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
