Cited by 431Mathematical Inequalities and ApplicationsAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Relative entropy and the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson-Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory

Uhlmann, A.·1977·Communications in Mathematical Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01609834

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uhlmann, A.
Affiliations
Leipzig University (DE)
Corresponding author
Uhlmann, A.
Venue
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Published
1977-02
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
21-32
ISSN
  • 0010-3616 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0916
OpenAlex
W2076249063
Cited by
431
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Communications in Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Inequalities and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
Kullback-Leibler divergence, interpolation theory, seminorms, joint convexity, completely positive maps, quantum information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review