Cited by 12Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsFluid dynamics and aerodynamics studiesAerospace and Aviation Technology

Vogelflügel und Gleitflug. Einführung in die aerodynamische Betrachtungsweise des Flügels

Nachtigall, Werner·1975·Journal für Ornithologie

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01643073

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nearly all bird species can alter the shape of their wings and thus change their aerodynamic properties.

    “Nearly all bird species can alter the shape of their wings and thus can change their aerodynamic properties [11], [12]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nachtigall, W.
Affiliations
Saarland University (DE)
Corresponding author
Nachtigall, Werner
Venue
Journal für Ornithologie
Published
1975-01
Volume
116
Issue
1
Pages
1-38
ISSN
  • 0021-8375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0361
OpenAlex
W2314341982
Cited by
12
References
6
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal für Ornithologie (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace and Aviation Technology
Keywords
bird wings, gliding flight, wing aerodynamics, avian flight mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review