The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cultural dimensions in management and planning
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture
Vance, A., Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C., & Straub, D. W. (2008) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240403 · Cited by 599
Modern attitudes toward older adults in the aging world: A cross-cultural meta-analysis.
North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0039469 · Cited by 560
A cross‐cultural study of group process and development in online conferences
Gunawardena, C. N., Nolla, A. C., Wilson, P. L., Lopez‐Islas, J. R., Ramirez‐Angel, N., & Megchun‐Alpizar, R. M. (2001) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/0158791010220106 · Cited by 198
National Culture and Social Desirability Bias in Measuring Public Service Motivation
Kim, S. H., & Kim, S. (2016) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399713498749 · Cited by 124
Kongsompong, K., Green, R. T., & Patterson, P. G. (2009) · Australasian Marketing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.05.013 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Hofstede, G.
- Venue
- Asia Pacific Journal of Management
- Published
- 1984-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 81-99
- ISSN
- 0217-4561 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9958
- OpenAlex
- W1996874724
- Cited by
- 1,465
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cultural dimensions in management and planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf01733682
- The paper
- Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01733682
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
