Cited by 599Technology Adoption and User BehaviourPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionUsability and User Interface Design

Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture

Open access
Vance, Anthony, Elie-Dit-Cosaque, Christophe, Straub, Detmar W.·2008·Journal of Management Information Systems

Abstract

The topic of trust in information technology (IT) artifacts has piqued interest among researchers, but studies of this form of trust are not definitive regarding which factors contribute to it the most. Our study empirically tests a model of trust in IT artifacts that increases our understanding in two ways. First, it sets forth two previously unexamined system quality constructs-navigational structure and visual appeal. We found that both of these system quality constructs significantly predict the extent to which users place trust in mobile commerce technologies. Second, our study considers the effect of culture by comparing the trust of French and American potential users in m-commerce technologies. We found that not only does culture directly affect user trust in IT artifacts but it also moderates the extent to which navigational structure affects this form of trust. These findings show that system quality and culture significantly affect trust in the IT artifact and point to rich possibilities for future research in these areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2753/mis0742-1222240403

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structural assurance and institutional structure are consistently found to directly promote initial trusting belief in an online vendor due to trust transference or cognitive consistency.

    “First, structural assurance and institutional structure are consistently found to directly promote initial trusting belief in an online vendor (McKnight et al. 2002b; Pavlou and Gefen 2004; Vance et al. 2008) due to trust transference, where perceptions about the security of the transaction context are likely to affect the perceptions of the trustee in that context (Stewart 2003) ; or du”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vance, A., Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C., & Straub, D. W.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Published
2008-04
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
73-100
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
OpenAlex
W2148970282
Cited by
599
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 39
FWCI
48.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
system quality, navigational structure, visual appeal, mobile commerce, culture, cross-cultural comparison, moderating effect, user trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review