Charybdotoxin-sensitive K(Ca) channel is not involved in glucose-induced electrical activity in pancreatic β-cells
Abstract
The effects of charybdotoxin (CTX) on single [Ca2+]-activated potassium channel (K(Ca)) activity and whole-cell K+ currents were examined in rat and mouse pancreatic beta-cells in culture using the patch-clamp method. The effects of CTX on glucose-induced electrical activity from both cultured beta-cells and beta-cells in intact islets were compared. K(Ca) activity was very infrequent at negative patch potentials (-70 less than Vm less than 0 mV), channel activity appearing at highly depolarized Vm. K(Ca) open probability at these depolarized Vm values was insensitive to glucose (10 and 20 mM) and the metabolic uncoupler 2,4 dinitrophenol (DNP). However, DNP blocked glucose-evoked action potential firing and reversed glucose-induced inhibition of the activity of K+ channels of smaller conductance. The venom from Leiurus quinquestriatus hebreus (LQV) and highly purified CTX inhibited K(Ca) channel activity when applied to the outer aspect of the excised membrane patch. CTX (5.8 and 18 nM) inhibited channel activity by 50 and 100%, respectively. Whole-cell outward K+ currents exhibited an early transient component which was blocked by CTX, and a delayed component which was insensitive to the toxin. The individual spikes evoked by glucose, recorded in the perforated-patch modality, were not affected by CTX (20 nM). Moreover, the frequency of slow oscillations in membrane potential, the frequency of action potentials and the rate of repolarization of the action potentials recorde…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Charybdotoxin, a blocker of BK channels, did not affect electrical activity, action potential firing, or the voltage-gated K+ current of mouse β-cells.
“However, following the discovery of the central role of the KATP channel in glucose-dependent depolarization, and the finding that charybdotoxin, a blocker of BK channels, did not affect electrical activity, action potential firing (356), or the voltage-gated K+ current of mouse β-cells (632), it was concluded that BK channels contribute little to either glucose-induced membrane depolarization or”
From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [356]
BK channels contribute little to either glucose-induced membrane depolarization or action potential repolarization in β-cells.
“it was concluded that BK channels contribute little to either glucose-induced membrane depolarization or action potential repolarization in β-cells.”
From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [356]
Cites
Intracellular ATP directly blocks K+ channels in pancreatic B-cells
Cook, D. L., & Hales, N. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/311271a0 · Cited by 1,208 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The most studied, the ATP-sensitive channel, is blocked by ATP acting from the intracellular aspect of the membrane in excised patches ( Cook & Hales, 1984 ) or by glucose metabolism in cell-attached patches (Ashcroft, Harrison & Ashcroft, 1984; Misler et al., 1986).”
BackgroundResultMinimal model for membrane oscillations in the pancreatic beta-cell
Chay, T. R., & Keizer, J. (1983) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(83)84384-7 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men
Rorsman, P., & Ashcroft, F. M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2017 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Why pancreatic islets burst but single beta cells do not. The heterogeneity hypothesis
Smolen, P., Rinzel, J., & Sherman, A. (1993) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(93)81539-x · Cited by 158 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kukuljan, M., Goncalves, A. A., & Atwater, I.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Membrane Biology
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-195
- ISSN
- 0022-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1424
- OpenAlex
- W2001539169
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The Journal of Membrane Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Keywords
- charybdotoxin, calcium-activated potassium channels, pancreatic beta cells, action potential firing, 2,4-dinitrophenol, metabolic uncoupling, potassium currents, pancreatic islets, membrane potential oscillations
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cells, Cultured, Dinitrophenols, Glucose, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Membrane Potentials, Rats, Inbred Strains, Scorpion Venoms, Potassium Channels, Charybdotoxin, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review