Double-level languages and co-operative working
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Robinson notes that the main complaint against the Coordinator has been that it seems to exclude negotiation, i.e., it does not support a transition to the co-constructive level of collaboration.
“Robinson [20] notes that the main complaint against the Coordinator has been that it seems to exclude negotiation, or - to put in our words - that it does not support a transition to the co-constructive level of collaboration.”
From Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities (1998) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496 · see citing works
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces
Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.111 · Cited by 3,238 · see citing works
Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work
Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/bf00752449 · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach
Berg, M. (1999) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(99)00011-8 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence
Bjørn, P., & Ngwenyama, O. (2009) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00281.x · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities
Bardram, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1145/289444.289483 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Territorial Functioning in Collaborative Writing: Fragmented Exchanges and Common Outcomes
Larsen-Ledet, I., & Korsgaard, H. (2019) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-019-09359-8 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Robinson, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Robinson, Mike
- ORCID
- Robinson, Mike
- Venue
- AI & Society
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-60
- ISSN
- 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-5655
- OpenAlex
- W1988320565
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- AI & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Keywords
- computer-supported cooperative work, equality, reciprocal effects, meeting scheduling, bargaining, co-authorship, coordination, planning, design support, co-design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
