The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nigel Gilbert, G. (1977) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631277700700112 · Cited by 691
Cited by
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002 · Cited by 2,733
How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures
Eck, N. J. V., & Waltman, L. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21075 · Cited by 966
Su, H.-N., & Lee, P.-C. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0259-8 · Cited by 916
Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(00)00051-0 · Cited by 882
Metadata
- Authors
- Rip, A., & Courtial, J. P.
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 1984-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 381-400
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2008331969
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
