Cited by 882scientometrics and bibliometrics researchInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis

Ding, Ying, Chowdhury, Gobinda G, Foo, Schubert·2001·Information Processing & Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0306-4573(00)00051-0

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Keyword co-occurrence analysis helps to reveal the interaction between different research directions and partition the field of knowledge.

    “This analysis helps to reveal the interaction between the different research directions and partition the field of knowledge (Ding et al. 2001).”

    From Blockchain technology in the smart city: A bibliometric review (2022) · cites this paper as Ding et al. 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Ding, Ying
Venue
Information Processing & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
817-842
ISSN
  • 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-4573
OpenAlex
W2164856000
Cited by
882
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 27
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Processing & Management (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
information retrieval research, research trends, intellectual structure, co-word analysis, research topics, controlled vocabulary, Science Citation Index, Social Science Citation Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review