The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interleukin-6 response to laparoscopic and open colectomy
Abstract
PURPOSE: It has been postulated that cortisol and interleukin-6 play a significant role in the modulation of the early inflammatory response following surgical intervention. There are no available data on the normal responses of these mediators following major laparoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in cortisol (by fluorescence polarization immunoassay), interleukin-6 (by enzyme-linked immunoassay), and interleukin-1 (by enzyme-linked immunoassay) after elective laparoscopic colon resections. METHODS: All patients undergoing colon resection between February 1, 1992 and April 30, 1992 were eligible for study. Selection of laparoscopic (N = 12) vs. open (N = 41) resection was determined by the attending surgeon. All patients received a standard general anesthetic with endotracheal intubation. Cortisol, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1 were measured at preinduction, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, and 5 hours after the induction. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-1 were additionally measured at 12 hours, 24 hours, and 72 hours after induction. Comparisons were made between the laparoscopic patients (N = 12) and age, sex, and operation-matched open patients (N = 12). RESULTS: Cortisol levels rose in the early postoperative period in both open and laparoscopic groups with no significant differences occurring between the cohorts at any of the measured time intervals. The interleukin-6 levels of the laparoscopic cohort (N = 12) were significantly lower than those of the open cohort (N = 12) between 3 and 24 hours postinduction (P < 0.05). Interleukin-1 levels remained undetectable in virtually all patients irrespective of operative technique or postoperative interval. There was no correlation between peak interleukin-6 levels and operative times (laparoscopic, r = 0.31; open, r = 0.36) or blood loss (laparoscopic, r = 0.10; open, r = 0.20). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that laparoscopic colon resections do not appear to alter cortisol or interleukin-1 responses when compared with open colon resection. There is, however, a significant blunting of the interleukin-6 response associated with the use of laparoscopic techniques for colectomy compared with standard laparotomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Detection of circulating tumor necrosis factor after endotoxin administration
Michie, H. R., Manogue, K. R., Spriggs, D. R., Revhaug, A., O'Dwyer, S., Dinarello, C. A., Cerami, A., Wolff, S. M., & Wilmore, D. W. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198806093182301 · Cited by 1,677
Cited by
LAPAROSCOPIC BOWEL INJURY: INCIDENCE AND CLINICAL PRESENTATION
BISHOFF, J. T., ALLAF, M. E., KIRKELS, W., MOORE, R. G., KAVOUSSI, L. R., & SCHRODER, F. (1999) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61797-x · Cited by 285
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse
Solomon, M. J., Young, C. J., Eyers, A. A., & Roberts, R. A. (2002) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01957.x · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Harmon, G. D., Senagore, A. J., Kilbride, M. J., & Warzynski, M. J.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 754-759
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039525419
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.