The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LAPAROSCOPIC BOWEL INJURY: INCIDENCE AND CLINICAL PRESENTATION
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bowel injury is a potential complication of any abdominal or retroperitoneal surgical procedure. We determine the incidence and assess the sequelae of laparoscopic bowel injury, and identify signs and symptoms of an unrecognized injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1991 and June 1998 laparoscopic urological procedures were performed in 915 patients, of whom 8 had intraoperative bowel perforation or abrasion injuries. In addition, 2 cases of unrecognized bowel perforation referred from elsewhere were reviewed. A survey of the surgical and gynecological literature revealed 266 laparoscopic bowel perforation injuries in 205,969 laparoscopic cases. RESULTS: In our series laparoscopic bowel perforation occurred in 0.2% of cases (2) and bowel abrasion occurred in 0.6% (6). The 6 bowel abrasion injuries were recognized intraoperatively and 5 were repaired immediately. In 4 cases, including 2 referred from elsewhere, perforation injuries were not recognized intraoperatively and they had an unusual presentation postoperatively. These patients had severe, single trocar site pain, abdominal distention, diarrhea and leukopenia followed by acute cardiopulmonary collapse secondary to sepsis within 96 hours of surgery. The combined incidence of bowel complications in the literature was 1.3/1,000 cases. Most injuries (69%) were not recognized at surgery. Of the injuries 58% were of small bowel, 32% were of colon and 50% were caused by electrocautery. Of the patients 80% required laparotomy to repair the bowel injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel injury following laparoscopic surgery is a rare complication that may have an unusual presentation and devastating sequelae. Any bowel injury, including serosal abrasions, should be treated at the time of recognition. Persistent focal pain in a trocar site with abdominal distention, diarrhea and leukopenia may be the first presenting signs and symptoms of an unrecognized laparoscopic bowel injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Haine, M. M.-L., & Meeùs, N. (1986) · Cited by 3,464
Interleukin-6 and the acute phase response
Heinrich, P. C., Castell, J. V., & Andus, T. (1990) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2650621 · Cited by 2,734
Deziel, D. J., Millikan, K. W., Economou, S. G., Doolas, A., Ko, S.-T., & Airan, M. C. (1993) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80397-6 · Cited by 1,383
Schwartz, S. I. (1974) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud · Cited by 978
Response of Serum Interleukin-6 in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery of Varying Severity
Cruickshank, A. M., Fraser, W. D., Burns, H. J. G., Van Damme, J., & Shenkin, A. (1990) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs0790161 · Cited by 745
Metabolic and inflammatory responses after open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Jakeways, M. S. R., Mitchell, V, Hashim, I. A., Chadwick, S. J. D., Shenkin, A., Green, C. J., & Carli, F. (1994) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800810146 · Cited by 178
Interleukin-6 response to laparoscopic and open colectomy
Harmon, G. D., Senagore, A. J., Kilbride, M. J., & Warzynski, M. J. (1994) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02050137 · Cited by 163
Laparoscopic repair of small bowel and colon
NEZHAT, C. R., Nezhat, F. R., Ambroze, W. L., & Pennington, E. (1993) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/bf00704384 · Cited by 82
Cadeddu, J. A., Regan, F., Kavoussi, L. R., & Moore, R. G. (1997) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64212-5 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Cited by
PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE MONTSOURIS 3-YEAR EXPERIENCE
GUILLONNEAU, B., ROZET, F., CATHELINEAU, X., LAY, F., BARRET, E., DOUBLET, J.-D., BAUMERT, H., & VALLANCIEN, G. (2002) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65381-5 · Cited by 344
Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions
Van Goor, H. (2007) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01358.x · Cited by 320
Vallancien, G., Cathelineau, X., Baumert, H., Doublet, J. D., & Guillonneau, B. (2002) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64823-9 · Cited by 254
Management of Complications of Prostate Cancer Treatment
Michaelson, M. D., Cotter, S. E., Gargollo, P. C., Zietman, A. L., Dahl, D. M., & Smith, M. R. (2008) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/ca.2008.0002 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- BISHOFF, J. T., ALLAF, M. E., KIRKELS, W., MOORE, R. G., KAVOUSSI, L. R., & SCHRODER, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 887-890
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2120539968
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LAPAROSCOPIC BOWEL INJURY: INCIDENCE AND CLINICAL PRESENTATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61797-x
- The paper
- BISHOFF, J. T., ALLAF, M. E., KIRKELS, W., MOORE, R. G., KAVOUSSI, L. R., & SCHRODER, F. (1999). LAPAROSCOPIC BOWEL INJURY: INCIDENCE AND CLINICAL PRESENTATION. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61797-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.